--- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James J. Ramsey wrote:
I tested the Jan 3rd i386 netinst iso. It still
doesn't work with older ATAPI CD-ROMs that can't
handle DMA, since 1) the standard kernel parameter
ide=nodma gets mysteriously ignored by the
installer,
There is nothing
--- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James J. Ramsey wrote:
The documentation on expert mode in the
INSTALLATION-HOWTO is a little thin, but you
*seem* to
be saying that just to turn off DMA for the
CD-ROM, I
have resort to avoid using Debian's hardware
detection
and load
I was advised that to workaround my pet problem of my
CD-ROM's broken support for DMA that I was to use the
expert install. I was told that since the installer in
expert mode prompts me to pass parameters to a module
it is about to load, I can pass the appropriate
parameters to the module that
--- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sándor Bárány wrote:
After the hardware detection, the install loads the
frame buffer module (even there was a vga=normal
parameter specified on the kernel line), which fails
(the hardware is so old, there is no frame buffer
support). This causes a
--- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless we find something badly wrong with them, the
installation images
currently in testing for i386, and the Jan 3rd i386
isos will be the
final images used for beta 2 for i386.
I tested the Jan 3rd i386 netinst iso. It still
doesn't work with
--- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James J. Ramsey wrote:
The
installer
seems to filter out some of the parameters that
are
passed at the boot prompt, even though they are
standard-issue, documented kernel parameters. In
B?r?ny's case, the ignored parameter was
vga=normal
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040103
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso from
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/20040103/
Also applies to the copies of sarge-i386-netinst.iso
from
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/
dated
--- James J. Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James J. Ramsey wrote:
When I attempted to install with the 2003-12-31
netinst CD, not long after I did the language
selection, I got an error message like this:
The integrity check for FOO
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20031231
Okay, *now* I'm doing the proper installation report
that I should have done before.
Debian-installer-version: From
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/,
dated 2003-12-31, used sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Date: Morning of Jan.
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040101
(Another proper installation report that I should have
done before.)
Debian-installer-version: From
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/,
dated 2004-01-01, used sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Date: Morning of Jan. 2
Method: Booted
When I attempted to install with the 2003-12-31
netinst CD, not long after I did the language
selection, I got an error message like this:
The integrity check for FOO failed. It is most
likely corrupt. Aborting.
After that, I was able to reboot and get back to my
old system.
FOO varies a bit.
--- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James J. Ramsey wrote:
When I attempted to install with the 2003-12-31
netinst CD, not long after I did the language
selection, I got an error message like this:
The integrity check for FOO failed. It is most
likely corrupt. Aborting
12 matches
Mail list logo
