Re: todo?

2002-11-21 Thread Jim Lynch
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:34:34 + Richard Hirst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 12:21:56AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: Getting d-i to work on other arches than i386 is high-priority. I know talk is cheap, but I do intend to work on d-i for hppa and ia64. Just a matter of

Re: Partition tools (Re: debian-installer status -- 2002-07-29)

2002-08-31 Thread Jim Lynch
On 30 Aug 2002 17:05:52 +0200 Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Jim Lynch | Over the past few days, I tried to build debian-installer, and | subtracting some minor frustrations that could have been cleared up | in the docs, it was pretty easy to build, if tedious: essentially, I

Re: Installation problem

2002-08-28 Thread Jim Lynch
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 11:26:35 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Hi I am running into a problem during installation - the initial part of the installation - where the system simply boots. I am trying to install the Woody distro with a 2.4xx kernel. (I can make the system install

Re: Partition tools (Re: debian-installer status -- 2002-07-29)

2002-08-28 Thread Jim Lynch
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 21:09:22 -0400 Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:42:30PM -0700, Jim Lynch wrote: On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:46:41 -0400 Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am in complete agreement that we would not want to include EVMS, XFS

Re: Partition tools (Re: debian-installer status -- 2002-07-29)

2002-08-19 Thread Jim Lynch
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:46:41 -0400 Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 12:09:08AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h Matt Zimmerman wrote on Mon Jul 29, 2002 um 09:00:42AM: What is the basis for your objection? Are you going to try to stop

Why, IYO, is d-i worse than b-f? | Let's test | delay caused by work, not attitude

2002-07-28 Thread Jim Lynch
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:22:34 +0200 Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #include hallo.h Greetings :) Why is it that you think debian-installer is somehow worse than boot-floppies? Have you tried to build either? See below. Nice. I have seen how motivation disappears when you are waiting

Re: [d-i] debconf, partitioning widget?

2002-07-23 Thread Jim Lynch
On 16 Jul 2002 17:09:25 +0200 Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: other arches like mips, mipsel, hppa, s390, arm etc will have to be taken care of by people who know those arches. The same goes for our Hurd and *BSD people -- if you want to release with woody + 1, you will have to

Re: [d-i] debconf, partitioning widget?

2002-07-23 Thread Jim Lynch
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 14:30:15 +0200 Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #include hallo.h Greetings :) Anthony Towns wrote on Tue Jul 16, 2002 um 04:53:26PM: We can stick with boot-floppies for Woody+1 and release Debian-4.0 with DI ;) From what I have read of the difficulties

Re: Build failures on SID

2002-07-23 Thread Jim Lynch
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:54:01 +0200 (CEST) Attila Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Hi! But isn't packages in SID which will be merged into woody? No. Woody is -released-. If they were not already, they never will be. Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Boot Error

2002-07-23 Thread Jim Lynch
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:59:37 +0200 Xerath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Im getting this error ever time I boot Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 030 current - tss.cr3 = 001, %cr3 = 00101000 *pde = Oops:0002 CPU : 0 EIP: 0010:[c02fd3c2]