Re: Re-planning for 12.6

On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 05:44:48PM +0100, Andy Simpkins wrote: > > On 21/04/2024 01:57, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 05:41:13PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:58:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > > > H

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

frozen. Mark indicated "maybe" and no answer from press. If that date works please reply urgently otherwise we're looking into May and possibly just skipping to line up with the final bullseye anyway. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debia

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

The 20th is a no for me. > May 4th > May 11th Currently OK for me. Though as soon as we're heading into the middle of May we might as well wait for the next cadence in June. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://pe

Re: Bug#1064588: bookworm-pu: package glibc/2.36-9+deb12u5

stems will be left with a few > issues, and the differences with upstream will increase, which might > make next fixes more difficult to review. I'm happy with it from SRM point of view, but as you say d-i ack needed. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@deb

Upcoming stable point release (12.6)

Hi, The next point release for "bookworm" (12.6) is scheduled for Saturday, April 6th. Processing of new uploads into bookworm-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceeding weekend. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian

Re: Planning for 12.6

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 06:29:36PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 18:04 +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability > > for: > > > > 7  April > > I assume you mean the 6th he

Planning for 12.6

Hi, 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability for: 7 April 13 April 20 April Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

> On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 21:25 +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > It's time to set a date for 12.5 (taking account of the emergency .4) > > and 11.9. I expect this to be the penultimate update for bullseye > > before LTS. > > > > Please indicate availabil

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

Hi, The most likely contenders are 10th and 17th February but unless I missed it, there's no indication from ftp-master (crucial) or webmasters (highly desirable). Are either of those dates preferable for you? Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org

Re: Bug#1059656: bookworm-pu: package espeak-ng/1.51+dfsg-10+deb12u1

hen > e.g. reading a webpage that contains the CVE triggers. > > [ Tests ] > CVE tests are getting added in the patch. > > [ Risks ] > The code is relatively simple, comes from upstream, and has been in > testing since December 24th. Sorry, I hadn't spotted the udeb. d-i ack

Planning for 12.5/11.9

, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1

Re: Planning for 12.3

On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 06:59:03PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > How about: > 4th December (better for cadence) > 11th December (more likely suitable in practice) Erm, astute readers will realise the 4th and 11th are Saturdays in November, not December. The correct proposa

Planning for 12.3

that we get into holidays and well off cadence. How about: 4th December (better for cadence) 11th December (more likely suitable in practice) Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

Upcoming stable (12.2) and oldstable (11.8) point releases

The next point releases for "bookworm" (12.2) and "bullseye" (11.8) will take place on Saturday, October 7th 2023. Processing of new uploads into the relevant queues will be frozen the preceding weekend. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.

Re: 11.8/12.2 planning

> >Let's say 30 Sep is still preferred, 7th Oct or at a stretch 14th Oct are > >options. Please indicate your availability for those three. Right, 7th October seems to be the one. Usual confirmations to follow. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j..

Re: Bug#1043521: bookworm-pu: package systemd/252.14-1~deb12u1

atibility > breakages, and with automated non-trivial CI jobs that also cover > Debian and Ubuntu. I have already uploaded to p-u. > > Debdiff attached. No packaging changes besides refreshing patches. Looks fine to me, but adding d-i to the loop for any objections. Thanks, -

Bug#1042711: bookworm-pu: package debian-archive-keyring/2023.3+deb12u1

; urgency=medium + + * Clean up leftover keyrings in trusted.gpg.d + * Adjust keyring cleanup versions for a stable update + + -- Jonathan Wiltshire Sun, 30 Jul 2023 20:30:54 +0100 + debian-archive-keyring (2023.3) unstable; urgency=medium * Reinstate cleanup of the APT keyrings for buster

11.8/12.2 planning

I think I confused matters with my messy thread; let's start again. I originally suggested: Jonathan Wiltshire (2023-06-28): > The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September > 2023. Please indicate your availability for: > > 23 Sep > 30 Sep (preferred) >

Upcoming stable point release (12.1)

Hi, The first point release for "bookworm" (12.1) is scheduled for Saturday, July 22nd. Processing of new uploads into bookworm-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian

11.8/12.2 planning

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 08:21:54AM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Subject: 12.1 planning That should, of course, be 11.8/12.2. Sorry. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 40

12.1 planning

Hi, The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September 2023. Please indicate your availability for: 23 Sep 30 Sep (preferred) 7 Oct Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http

Re: 11.8 planning

After some discusion we'll leave 11.8 until its proper cadence in September and combine it with 12.2. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC

Re: 12.1 planning

On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 10:04:06PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > The promised 4-6 weeks following release for 12.1 looks like: > > 8th July (4) > 15th July (5) > 22nd July (6) We'll go for 12.1 only on 22nd July, announcements to follow. -- Jon

Re: 11.8 planning

stable candece. I was going to suggest, though, that 11.8 gets pushed back to cadence with 12.2 and we just do 12.1 on its own first. How does that sound? -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 40

12.1 planning

Hi, The promised 4-6 weeks following release for 12.1 looks like: 8th July (4) 15th July (5) 22nd July (6) The first of them would combine with a very stretched 11.8; SRM might prefer to get 11.8 done earlier and leave more time for 12.1 to mature. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire

11.8 planning

July at a push 1: a shame that joke hasn't worked for some years now Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Re: 11.7 planning

On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 08:33:47PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > We're overdue for 11.7 and need it done with a keyring update included > before bookworm can be released. The wheels are turning on the keyring so > how do dates in April look for everybody? Saturdays are 1st (pro

11.7 planning

Hi, We're overdue for 11.7 and need it done with a keyring update included before bookworm can be released. The wheels are turning on the keyring so how do dates in April look for everybody? Saturdays are 1st (probably too soon), 8th, 15th, 22nd and 29th. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire

Re: Bug#877258: stretch-pu: package busybox/1:1.22.0-19+deb9u1

ld be awesome. Depending on external things, I could > > still make time if that's only a few days before the freeze, but a full > > week should help ensure reviewing/testing happens in time. > > Okay, I'll try to get this finally done within the next week. How's th

Re: Bug#933764: buster-pu: package e2fsprogs/1.44.5-1+deb10u1

frag_files_after_defrag * 100) / > + regular_count); > + } > + break; > diff -Nru e2fsprogs-1.44.5/debian/patches/series > e2fsprogs-1.44.5/debian/patches/series > ---

Re: Scheduling 10.1 and maybe 9.10

Ok, we have a winner. Let's make them both 7th September so press aren't under too much pressure. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3

Re: Scheduling 10.1 and maybe 9.10

On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 08:36:30PM -0300, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 07:35:01PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > - Auguest 31st > > - September 7th > > These look like the two options so far. Any other takers? I think we're just awaiting FTP m

Re: Bug#931386: stretch-pu: package fribidi/0.19.7-1.1

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 05:19:56AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Jonathan Wiltshire (2019-07-21): > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 07:36:55PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > Tags: stretch > > >

Re: Bug#931386: stretch-pu: package fribidi/0.19.7-1.1

t; } > } > +if (XkbKeyHasActions(xkb, i + req->firstKeySym)) > + XkbResizeKeyActions(xkb, i + req->firstKeySym, > +XkbNumGroups(wire->groupInfo) * wire->width); > oldMap->kt_index[0] = wire->ktIndex[0

Re: Scheduling 10.1 and maybe 9.10

On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 07:35:01PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > - August 24th I have no idea how I missed the event that weekend... > - Auguest 31st > - September 7th These look like the two options so far. Any other takers? > We also have a point release of 9.10 to fit

Scheduling 10.1 and maybe 9.10

10th - August 17th and failing those, let's look ahead as far as: - August 24th - Auguest 31st - September 7th We also have a point release of 9.10 to fit in some time - would the same day or adjacent weekends be preferable? Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j

Re: Scheduling 9.9

Hi, On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 06:28:05PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Please indicate your availablility out of: > > - April 13 > - April 20 (Easter weekend) > - April 27 >From the replies so far I guess at the moment we're looking at the 27th. Any other inputs? Tha

Scheduling 9.9

Hi, Please indicate your availablility out of: - April 13 - April 20 (Easter weekend) - April 27 Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942

Scheduling 9.7

Hi, 9.7 is a bit overdue already (current events being a bit of a time-sink). Please indicate your availablility out of: - (Feb 2 unlikely, FOSDEM) - Feb 9 - Feb 16 Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer

Re: Scheduling 9.6

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 09:20:57PM +0800, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 06:18:06PM +0800, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It's that time again and I'm aiming for 15th September, i.e. freeze on > > 8th September. Please indi

Re: Scheduling 9.6

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 06:18:06PM +0800, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > It's that time again and I'm aiming for 15th September, i.e. freeze on > 8th September. Please indicate your availablility out of: > > - Sept 8th (freeze on the 1st, bit early) > - Sept 15th (

Scheduling 9.6

Hi, It's that time again and I'm aiming for 15th September, i.e. freeze on 8th September. Please indicate your availablility out of: - Sept 8th (freeze on the 1st, bit early) - Sept 15th (ideal) - Sept 22nd Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org

Upcoming oldstable point release (8.11)

of the Release Team. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Scheduling final Jessie point release, 8.11

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:26:08PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > - 23rd Jun > - (30th Jun I already know is impossible, for the sake of completeness) > - 7th July Let's go for 23rd June. I'll send the premliminaries shortly. Thanks, -- Jonathan

Scheduling 9.5

) Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Scheduling final Jessie point release, 8.11

://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/missing-security-oldstable.html -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Re: Scheduling 9.3

On 2017-09-24 17:38, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Accordingly I'm looking at one of: 25th November 2nd December 9th December (but preferably earlier, or we start gradually extending the cycle) Of course the 25th would be a terrible choice and I should have realised

Scheduling 9.3

the cycle) Please advise your availability. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Upcoming stable point release (9.2)

Hi, The second point release for "stretch" (9.2) is scheduled for Saturday, October 7th. Processing of new uploads into stretch-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian

Re: Scheduling 9.2

y are happy (as I'm not sure if > >Laura's response only covers the initial suggested dates). > > > > I confirm that the publicity team is fine with the weekend of Oct. 7. Ok, let's make it 7th. Thanks. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.or

Re: Scheduling 9.2

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:31:22PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 04:48:14PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I'm working on dates for 9.2; by a two month cycle we're aiming for around > >23rd September. How about one of: > &g

Scheduling 9.2

and 4 months for oldstable; that way there isn't a month 3 to try and fit in betweens. So every other stable update will also be an oldstable. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 10:53:09AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2017-07-08 at 00:51 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:53:13PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: > > >[sorry for the delay in replying] > > > > > >On Sun, 2017-06-2

Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

Hi, A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) 15/16 July 22/23 July [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ] Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j

Re: Last last installation guide upload?

reased, they actually have *decreased*, I guess that's because it's now only chinese in the files. Samuel Unblocked, should make r0. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 409

Re: Please dak copy-installer 20170615

Hi, On 2017-06-15 15:00, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Release team, please hint it into testing: unblock debian-installer/20170615 urgent debian-installer/20170615 With pleasure. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer

Re: d-i-netboot-images package outdated (was Re: Debian Installer Stretch RC 5 release)

are feel free to kill my hint before the next run.) thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#855143: unblock: wpa/2.5-2+v2.4-4stretch1

gencontrol: > - dh_gencontrol -phostapd -- '-v1:$(VERSION)' > - dh_gencontrol --remaining-packages > - > override_dh_builddeb: > dh_builddeb -- -Zxz -z6 > ### end dh overrides > diff -Nru wpa-2.5-2+v2.4/debian/wpasupplicant.install > wpa-2.4/debian/wpasupplica

Re: Bug#854524: unblock: linux/4.9.6-3

0 and therefore would not be supportable in stretch. > > The debdiff would be too large for you to review, unfortunately. > Instead, here are the changelog entries: Likely to take on trust, but needs a d-i ack either way. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire

Re: Bug#854415: unblock: ndisc6/1.0.3-3

On 2017-02-07 18:52, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Hi, Jonathan Wiltshire <j...@debian.org> (2017-02-07): On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:42:06PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > Please unblock package ndisc6 Looks fine to me, but needs sign-off from the d-i RM. I don't know rdnssd well enou

Re: Bug#854415: unblock: ndisc6/1.0.3-3

Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi, On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:42:06PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > Please unblock package ndisc6 Looks fine to me, but needs sign-off from the d-i RM. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Develo

Re: Bug#843775: jessie-pu: package mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u2

. > This can result in a nonfunctional array. Twitched too soon; mdadm has a udeb, so it needs a d-i ack first. Sorry, please wait. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 /

Re: Please dak copy-installer 20150718 hint it into testing

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 09:23:32AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Release team, please hint it into testing: urgent debian-installer/20150718 Hint added. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http

Bug#782976: debian-installer-netboot-images packages kfreebsd images but kfreebsd is not in jessie.

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 02:17:25AM +0100, peter green wrote: Release team: can you clarify whether you intend to actually remove kfreebsd from the jessie suite of the official archive before/during the jessie release? Yes. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j

Re: New hints for d-i, release in a few days hopefully

, with many thanks to Didier Raboud... unblock rootskel-gtk/1.31 unblock-udeb rootskel-gtk/1.31 # l10n updates: unblock tzsetup/1:0.63 unblock-udeb tzsetup/1:0.63 All fine; unblocked. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer

Bug#734756: installation-reports: Hang during Select and Install Software

image to last night's daily and this resolved the problem, so assuming this is the same bug as the reporter encountered, it should be closable. (Control: tag -1 confirmed unreproducible? :) -- Jonathan Wiltshire Tiger Computing Ltd Linux for Business Tel: 01600 483 484 Web: http://www.tiger

Re: Bug#771607: Re : Re: Re : Re: Bug#771607: unblock: brltty/5.2~20141018-2

with that. Moreover, compiz can be easily implemented (Luca is doing). Please remember that we are talking about Jessie, not a downstream of Jessie. This discussion seems to have run into the sand. Is there any news? -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.5)

) Not a *major* problem for a point release, but it will slow down the CD release until I can test. On the other hand, you should have at least a few willing vict^w^w helpers in the same place to test CDs with you, which might even speed things up. -- Jonathan Wiltshire