Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image Version: Debian GNU/Linux testing Wheezy - Official Snapshot amd64
xfce-CD Binary-1 20130211-05:00
Machine: Toshiba C850/0G6
Vendor-Info:
http://www.mytoshiba.com.au/products/computers/satellite/c850/pscbwa-0g6001
Processor: Intel(R)
Yet another observation... loading the nonfree firmware and booting the
kernel with the nomodeset parameter helps a bit: the display is
discernable, but not yet usable.
It's flickering and the left approx 1/8th is on the right sie of the
screen (i.e. the left edge is displayed approx 7/8ths to
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Neale Banks wrote:
[...]
* The big one: Video card is (from lspci):
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI
Thames XT/GL [Radeon HD 7600M Series]
This appears to unsupported in X :-( Looking for updates/workarounds.
Moreinfo
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Steve McIntyre wrote:
[...]
Neale, could you try the following for me and tell me what happens
please? I need you to type the following (blind!) at the corrupt
display:
c (call up a grub command line)
terminal_output console (switch to
Package: installation-reports
A brief report of installing on a new Toshi L850/046
Boot method: CD
Image Version: Debian GNU/Linux testing Wheezy - Official Snapshot amd64
xfce-CD Binary-1 20130211-05:00
Machine: Toshiba L850/046
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3230M CPU @ 2.60GHz
Memory: 4GB
Package: installation-reports
Attempting to boot the Wheezy weekly amd64 CD of 2013/2/11 on a new
Toshiba L850/046 (in EFI mode, secure boot disabled) results in
scrambled display.
The machine initiates boot from the CD, displays 'Welcome to GRUB!'
then 'Warning: prefix is not set'.
Then the
We tested with the new weekly build[1] of 17 Dec 2012 - this failed in the
same way.
Neale.
[1]
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-xfce-CD-1.iso
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: installation-reports
Attempting to install wheezy i386 XFCE weekly build on Dell Optiplex
755 fails at Detect and mount CD-ROM with No common CD-ROM drive
was detected. Most recent weekly build tried is 2012/11/12 (XFCE).
The installer can successfully check the CD-ROM's integrity.
Hi,
Similar experience with a blue iMac and
debian-502a-powerpc-xfce+lxde-CD-1.iso today: install proceeds normally
but on reboot X doesn't get past a blank screen.
/etc/X11/xorg.conf has no content (exists, but zero length).
Log from X Server:
According to
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/apbs04.html#preseed-pkgsel I
can also choose to install no tasks, and force the installation of a set
of packages in some other way.
What is the correct way of preseeding to install no tasks?
Is it as simple as preseeding: tasksel
According to
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/apbs04.html#preseed-pkgsel I
can also choose to install no tasks, and force the installation of a set
of packages in some other way.
What is the correct way of preseeding to install no tasks?
Is it as simple as preseeding: tasksel
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Before, I was creating the Packages files, and did a 'gzip -c -9
Packages Packages.gz' to compress them. If I do them with 'cat
Packages | gzip --best Packages.gz', like debian-cd does it, then it
works.
Turns out this wasn't my problem (at least
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hmmm. These look *very* similar to issues I've seen in the last few
months while hacking on debian-cd:
* shortcomings in busybox gunzip (#402482)
thanks ;)
i suspected 'corrupted' indices (or, indicies not the way
Hi,
I've been, mostly successfully, customising the etch Netinst with
preseeding.
But... I added a few more debs to the pool and rebuilt Packages[.gz] with
apt-ftparchive - now debootstrap complains:
Warning: file:///cdrom/dists/etc/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz was corrupt
and
Warning:
Hi,
I've been customising Debian installation with preseeding using a preseed
file on the Netinst CD, which is mostly working out OK.
However, one point eludes me - getting a question to be always asked,
regardless of its priority.
Specifically, the hostname is set via DHCP but we'd like the
15 matches
Mail list logo
