On Jun 3, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* ty...@mit.edu ty...@mit.edu [2010-06-03 09:57]:
Bug#583592: shlibs.local tricks generate wrong dependency on libblkid1
Bug#583551: debian-installer: mkfs.ext3 fails to run
Forcibly Merged 583551 583592.
People seem to be hitting this
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 04:33:20PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Looking at the diff between the Lenny and Sid versions, I wonder at the
dropped build dependencies on libdevmapper/libselinux1.
From the release notes:
The blkid library is now much more efficiently handling devicemapper
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 04:32:23PM +0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-15 15:23]:
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080814 10:52]:
We have to set FSCKFIX=yes in /etc/default/rcS on machines that don't
have any I/O devices to follow the boot
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:05:21PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
I have a dual boot system, one is always stable and the other is used to
try out things. The bootloader is grub from stable (i.e. 0.97-27etch1).
I installed Lenny-Beta2 in my try-out-system without overwriting the
bootloader
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:34:26PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:13:06AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
In addition 1.41.0 closed a large number of bugs over 1.40.11, and is
the first version to have ext4 support.
Btw, a version of GRUB 2 with ext4dev support was
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:02:37PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 24 July 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
I wouldn't dream of asking debian-boot to support ext4dev at this late
date --- but there is one thing I would ask. As I recall, there was a
temporary fix to force to use of 128 byte
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:10:33AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
We synchronize the udeb binaries of testing with unstable. When the
packages goes to testing the udeb doesn't go automaticaly and it need
to be done by a ftpmaster (Jeroen is who usually does it for us).
If you update the
Hi,
I wasn't the one who requested that e2fsprogs 1.40.8-2 get migrated
from unstable to testing. So hopefully you guys were expecting it; I
believe you had requested that I coordinate with you before new
versions of e2fsprogs hit testing, so there wouldn't be as many issues
with the debian
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:31:50PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hi Ted,
I wasn't the one who requested that e2fsprogs 1.40.8-2 get migrated
from unstable to testing. So hopefully you guys were expecting it; I
believe you had requested that I coordinate with you before new
versions of
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:41:55AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Oh, I heard a rumor this package is having trouble building in
non-i386 arches. Hopefully you can look at addressing that quickly,
because I can't really adopt this package in boot-floppies until it's
built for all arches.
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 12:27:57PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
Isn't PIC used for a reason in shared libs? :)
Sure it is, but that reason doesn't really apply here.
The reason we compile shared libraries as PIC is so that many
applications can map the same object at different addresses
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:22:12PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 08:49:54AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
As long as they don't care about needing debugfs, they can probably
save 12k, maybe as much as 15k. How desperate for space are they?
12-15k is nothing
12 matches
Mail list logo
