[d-i] Extended 'Description' fields in control files

2002-09-13 Thread Martin Sjögren
I've been fiddling with Description-XYZ fields in control files, for the purpose of i18n in main-menu, and, well, dpkg doesn't like my UTF-8 :( I've got this in anna/debian/control: Description: Finish setting up the Debian installer anna's not nearly apt, but for the Debian installer, it

Re: [d-i] Extended 'Description' fields in control files

2002-09-13 Thread Junichi Uekawa
sure, still valid UTF-8, but it's UTF-8 for what the UTF-8 is if interpreted according to Latin1. I thought dpkg didn't assume anything at all about the encoding in control files? That it expected us-ascii and damn everyone who didn't follow that. Can I fix this somehow, or are we doomed

Re: [d-i] Extended 'Description' fields in control files

2002-09-13 Thread Martin Sjögren
fre 2002-09-13 klockan 10.18 skrev Junichi Uekawa: sure, still valid UTF-8, but it's UTF-8 for what the UTF-8 is if interpreted according to Latin1. I thought dpkg didn't assume anything at all about the encoding in control files? That it expected us-ascii and damn everyone who didn't

Re: [d-i] Extended 'Description' fields in control files

2002-09-13 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On 13 Sep 2002 10:29:55 +0200 Could we move that out of Description-xx: lines to generate some kind of po file? Believe me, nobody would be happier than me if we used po files instead ;) I was only working with it like this because this was the current concept of translating the

Re: [d-i] Extended 'Description' fields in control files

2002-09-13 Thread Martin Sjögren
fre 2002-09-13 klockan 11.20 skrev Junichi Uekawa: I had an impression that udebs description lines were translated through ddtp also ? That may be so signature.asc Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signeradmeddelandedel

Re: [d-i] Extended 'Description' fields in control files

2002-09-13 Thread Denis Barbier
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 05:18:58PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: sure, still valid UTF-8, but it's UTF-8 for what the UTF-8 is if interpreted according to Latin1. I thought dpkg didn't assume anything at all about the encoding in control files? That it expected us-ascii and damn