Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
This is the result printed on Dennis page. But it is indeed not
accurate, have a look at buildd logs and you will find more fuzzy
strings. So the problem here is that apt-all.pot is not up-to-date.
Here is an untested patch, but someone should ask
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:03:08AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
Hi Dennis,
At Fri, 12 Mar 2004 01:11:56 +0100,
Dennis Stampfer wrote:
exim4-config is mentioned as one of 2nd-stage installer packages but
is not listed in http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/fi.txt
and it seems not in
Hey,
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 06:00:13PM +0200, Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
exim4-config is mentioned as one of 2nd-stage installer packages but
is not listed in http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/fi.txt
and it seems not in any other language status page either.
It's listed in
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:03:08AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
snip
Well, does this really reflect newest unstable status?
I think ja.po of shadow and discover are already 100% translated.
/snip
Hmm. That's weird. I know that seppy does provides .po files for all the
packages listed as not yet
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 02:50:16PM -0300, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
[...]
Hmm. That's weird. I know that seppy does provides .po files for all the
packages listed as not yet fully translated into his web page at
http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/files/lang, but just to
be sure I went
Hey Andre,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 02:50:16PM -0300, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
Hmm. That's weird. I know that seppy does provides .po files for all the
packages listed as not yet fully translated into his web page at
http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/files/lang, but just to
be sure
Hi,
At 12 Mar 04 01:03:08 GMT,
Kenshi Muto wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/
Well, does this really reflect newest unstable status?
Ah, I misunderstood (new web page style tells what's I misunderstood :-) ).
These status are not in package/debian/po/, but in
re,
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 07:46:41AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
Well, does this really reflect newest unstable status?
I think ja.po of shadow and discover are already 100% translated.
Dennis, you may print package version on your pages.
good idea. I will do that.
dennis
--
To
Hi Dennis,
At Fri, 12 Mar 2004 01:11:56 +0100,
Dennis Stampfer wrote:
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:59:07 +0100
From: Dennis Stampfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Hey
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:03:08AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
Hi Dennis,
[...]
as some of you may have noticed, I am working on a status-page for
2nd-stage installer packages. I think it's running fine now:
http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/
Well, does this really reflect
10 matches
Mail list logo
