Can we actually get a version of b-f released ?
It's in a buildable state after a month of chaos,
after all, it might be an idea to tag release a version now.
I think a release would be a great idea. I'd really like to see a few
releases of b-f without RC bugs before we release woody. We
#include hallo.h
David Kimdon wrote on Wed Feb 27, 2002 um 08:26:29AM:
I think a release would be a great idea. I'd really like to see a few
releases of b-f without RC bugs before we release woody. We
definately need to make sure the 3 or so remaining RC bugs are fixed
before releaseing
On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 16:26, David Kimdon wrote:
I think a release would be a great idea. I'd really like to see a few
releases of b-f without RC bugs before we release woody. We
definately need to make sure the 3 or so remaining RC bugs are fixed
before releaseing 3.0.20, IMO.
Agreed.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 05:48:46PM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
We're also accumulating quite a selection of powerpc-specific bugs,
notably #138258, #131709, #132683, #134014, #135626. None of these are
^^
I assume you meant #128258.
marked RC, but the first one in particular
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
I'll have some time to work on them in the next few days, FWIW.
Hm. If you think that we have the chance to make at least one BF release
before the Woody release, go ahead. Kernel packages and
makedev/debootstrap will need some days,
5 matches
Mail list logo