On 13951 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th
for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work
for people?
Sounds ok to me. Start at 10 UTC or earlier/later?
I was assuming either 8ish UTC
On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 16:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
press@ - ping? :-)
...
Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th
for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work
for people?
I can be available as a backup for Neil if needed.
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 09:56 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 13947 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to
start planning for the first point release.
We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9
press@ - ping? :-)
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 21:22 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[Added some missed CCs; sigh]
On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:22:44PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[Added some missed CCs; sigh]
On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to
start planning for
On 13947 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to
start planning for the first point release.
We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9
really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2015-05-20):
Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th
for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work
for people?
Provided the p-u freeze happens on time so that I can perform d-i tests ahead
of
On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[Added some missed CCs; sigh]
On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to
start planning for the first point release.
We're also a little overdue for
[Added some missed CCs; sigh]
On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to
start planning for the first point release.
We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9
really wants to take place
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:08:59PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
May 23/24
Offline-ish on May 23.
Same for me.
May 30/31
OK.
OK
June 6/7
Offline on June 6, offline-ish on June 7.
OK
June 13/14
Offline-ish on June 13.
OK
June 20/21
OK.
Offline-ish both
(cc+=boot)
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2015-04-30):
As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to
start planning for the first point release.
AFAICT there haven't been too many reports of d-i being badly broken, so
there's not much to be fixed. Here's a
Hi
On 2015-05-01, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[...]
- I see gnutls28, linux, and wpa in pu; some testing couldn't hurt.
wpa should be safe (famous last words), as it contains only the one-line
security fix for CVE-2015-1863[1], which applies to a code path/ file not
used by the udeb (as CONFIG_P2P
12 matches
Mail list logo
