Hi
i just created a preliminary page [1] in debian's wiki about the web
frontend module i posted about some times ago: it contains status of the
project, links to source code and to screenshots.
Feedback is very welcomed :)
Attilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Hi
i just created a preliminary page [1] in debian's wiki about the web
frontend module i posted about some times ago: it contains status of the
project, links to source code and to screenshots.
whoops, the page is
Hi
I just uploaded [1] updated source code for the web frontend i was
writing for cdebconf: it's now almost complete in many of the most
important parts (tough many FIXME still can be found in the code) and
seems to be reasonably stable.
I would like very much if someone could review the
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 04/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This evening i built a test tarball, similar to those i used to build
when developing the GTK frontend, to test the web frontend with thttpd
in a real d-i environement.
The results were encouraging, even if a lot of
On 04/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This evening i built a test tarball, similar to those i used to build
when developing the GTK frontend, to test the web frontend with thttpd
in a real d-i environement.
The results were encouraging, even if a lot of work has to be done
On 03/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does anyone has a
better candidate than webfs ()?
I think thttpd[1] has also cgi support, you might want to look at
that, too. It is a little bit bigger, but probably, as an udeb, it can
be smaller.
[1]
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 03/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does anyone has a
better candidate than webfs ()?
I think thttpd[1] has also cgi support, you might want to look at
that, too. It is a little bit bigger, but probably, as an udeb, it can
be smaller.
Good advice
On 03/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does anyone has a
better candidate than webfs ()?
I think thttpd[1] has also cgi support, you might want to look at
that, too. It is a little bit bigger, but probably, as an udeb, it can
be smaller.
Good advice : i installed thttpd
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 03/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does anyone has a
better candidate than webfs ()?
I think thttpd[1] has also cgi support, you might want to look at
that, too. It is a little bit bigger, but probably, as an udeb, it can
be smaller.
Good
Hi
Following up to myself, i'm posting some updates about the web frontend
[1] for cdebconf that i'm writing (the idea is allowing people to
remotely install Debian with a web browser).
Original design of the frontend included development of an HTTP server
that should have took care of
Hi,
On Monday 12 June 2006 15:10, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I think it sounds pretty cool. m68k would certainly benefit from it,
and other archs as well (think serverroom). And I also think it's cool! Nice
work.
regards,
Holger
pgpvByu34v7kA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 12 June 2006 15:10, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I think it sounds pretty cool. m68k would certainly benefit from it,
and other archs as well (think serverroom). And I also think it's cool! Nice
work.
thank you, and as there seem to be some interest in
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 05:14:38PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
I would like to have some feedback from you: do you think this frontend
module could be somehow useful and is worth to be furtherly developed?
is there anyone interested in working on it?
I think it sounds pretty cool. m68k
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 05:14:38PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
I would like to have some feedback from you: do you think this frontend
module could be somehow useful and is worth to be furtherly developed?
is there anyone interested in working on it?
I think
Hi
when i first started working on the graphical frontend for the d-i, i
wanted to build something that allowed people to install the debian
using an HTML browser.
This would have allowed remote (once the network had setup by preseeding
it) and local graphical installations too, if an HTML
15 matches
Mail list logo
