On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 09:24, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:28, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 07:42:24PM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
Hi, I tried to rebuild d-i and I looked that symlinks of /lib/ld-2.2.5 to
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (and others) was missing.
* Philip Blundell
| On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 09:24, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
| On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:28, Matt Kraai wrote:
| On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 07:42:24PM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
|Hi, I tried to rebuild d-i and I looked that symlinks of /lib/ld-2.2.5 to
|
On Wed Jul 24, 2002 at 11:28:46AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 07:42:24PM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
Hi, I tried to rebuild d-i and I looked that symlinks of /lib/ld-2.2.5 to
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (and others) was missing.
Please remind me: why do we need to
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 10:21, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Philip Blundell
| On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 09:24, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
| On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:28, Matt Kraai wrote:
| On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 07:42:24PM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
|Hi, I tried to rebuild d-i and I
Erik Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed Jul 24, 2002 at 11:28:46AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 07:42:24PM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
Hi, I tried to rebuild d-i and I looked that symlinks of /lib/ld-2.2.5 to
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (and others) was missing.
Philip Blundell [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit:
Is it really useful to be able to do that for the installation disks?
Without information on what Debian patches have been applied, knowing
the base version number of the library doesn't seem to buy much. If
it's important to be able to
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 07:42:24PM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
Hi, I tried to rebuild d-i and I looked that symlinks of /lib/ld-2.2.5 to
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (and others) was missing.
Please remind me: why do we need to preserve these symlinks?
Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
7 matches
Mail list logo
