On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 12:36:57AM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> I seem to remember that boot-floppies was declared obsolete just after
> woody's release, so isn't it way past time to remove the boot-floppies
> source package from sid?

Please make sure that this situation is corrected first:

  boot-floppies |     3.0.22 |        stable | source
  boot-floppies |     3.0.23 |      unstable | source

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-*/current
  lrwxrwxrwx    1 archvsyn archvsyn       17 Jun 20  2003 
ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-alpha/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
  lrwxrwxrwx    1 archvsyn archvsyn       17 Jun 20  2003 
ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-arm/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
  lrwxrwxrwx    1 archvsyn archvsyn       17 Jun 20  2003 
ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-hppa/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
  lrwxrwxrwx    1 archvsyn archvsyn       17 Jun 20  2003 
ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-i386/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
  lrwxrwxrwx    1 archvsyn archvsyn       17 Jun 20  2003 
ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-ia64/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
  lrwxrwxrwx    1 archvsyn archvsyn       17 Jun 20  2003 
ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-m68k/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
  lrwxrwxrwx    1 archvsyn archvsyn       17 Jun 20  2003 
ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-mips/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
  lrwxrwxrwx    1 archvsyn archvsyn       17 Jun 20  2003 
ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-mipsel/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
  lrwxrwxrwx    1 archvsyn archvsyn       17 Jun 20  2003 
ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-powerpc/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
  lrwxrwxrwx    1 archvsyn archvsyn       17 Jun 20  2003 
ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-s390/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
  lrwxrwxrwx    1 archvsyn archvsyn       17 Jun 20  2003 
ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-sparc/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21

Otherwise removing boot-floppies from unstable will mean that we'll be
shipping boot-floppies in woody without corresponding source. Bug
#225704 is also open about this.

Ccing Joey as stable release manager. Can it be done by hand without an
upload to woody-proposed-updates (which I guess would mean a new version
number, which would mean a rebuild on all architectures, which would
mean great pain)?

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to