Processing control commands:
> tags 749991 + pending
Bug #749991 [debian-installer] debian-installer: Wrong kernel in
debian-installer package
Bug #926795 [debian-installer] di-netboot-assistant: Unable to install Debian
Buster amd64 from d-i n-a at 2019-04-10 generated boot-file
Added tag(s)
Processing control commands:
> tags 749991 + pending
Bug #749991 [debian-installer] debian-installer: Wrong kernel in
debian-installer package
Bug #926795 [debian-installer] di-netboot-assistant: Unable to install Debian
Buster amd64 from d-i n-a at 2019-04-10 generated boot-file
Ignoring
Control: tags 749991 + pending
Control: tags 367515 + pending
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 22:17 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> [...]
> > I just noticed that the relevant message currently appears with netinst
> > image,
> > too (because build badly broken).
> >
> > So, maybe
On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 22:17 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
[...]
> I just noticed that the relevant message currently appears with netinst image,
> too (because build badly broken).
>
> So, maybe we should not restrict the above proposed changing to the "netboot"
> installation method?
> (means:
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> That looks reasonable.
> I have prepared a proposal for this:
>
>
> snip ===
>
> diff --git a/debian/anna.templates b/debian/anna.templates
> index 66677ee..3709584 100644
> --- a/debian/anna.templates
>
Hi,
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > That looks reasonable.
> > I have prepared a proposal for this:
>
> The new text looks good to me.
>
> [...]
> > > Also, this should be an error message, not a question.
> >
> > For this, I would need some help, since I'm lacking the needed skills there.
> > The
Hi,
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-10-27 at 20:18 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Bugreport against kernel version mismatch, when using outdated or broken
> > netboot images:
> >
> >
> > Since it's unlikely that we completely prevent this issue to happen, maybe
> > we
> > could at
On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 15:56 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Philipp Wollschlegel (2019-10-28):
> > On 28.10.19 15:11, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2019-10-27 at 20:18 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > > > Bugreport against kernel version mismatch, when using outdated or
> > > > broken
> >
Hi all,
On 28.10.19 15:56, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Philipp Wollschlegel (2019-10-28):
>> On 28.10.19 15:11, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2019-10-27 at 20:18 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
Bugreport against kernel version mismatch, when using outdated or broken
netboot images:
>>
>>
Philipp Wollschlegel (2019-10-28):
> On 28.10.19 15:11, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-10-27 at 20:18 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >> Bugreport against kernel version mismatch, when using outdated or broken
> >> netboot images:
>
> This isn't a package / message problem, this is a
On 28.10.19 15:11, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-10-27 at 20:18 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
>> Bugreport against kernel version mismatch, when using outdated or broken
>> netboot images:
This isn't a package / message problem, this is a process problem.
The netboot image is not built
On Sun, 2019-10-27 at 20:18 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Bugreport against kernel version mismatch, when using outdated or broken
> netboot images:
>
>
> Since it's unlikely that we completely prevent this issue to happen, maybe we
> could at least change the error message, saying that the
Bugreport against kernel version mismatch, when using outdated or broken
netboot images:
Since it's unlikely that we completely prevent this issue to happen, maybe we
could at least change the error message, saying that the user should try
another / a newer installation image?
(as already
13 matches
Mail list logo
