Processed: Re: Bug#416543: [newt] Last letter of the title is cut

2007-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 416543 + patch pending Bug#416543: [newt] Last letter of the title is cut There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#416543: [newt] Last letter of the title is cut

2007-04-01 Thread Davide Viti
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 12:42:11PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: Tried to increase it to 10 with the patch below and title looks ok (see attached screenshot showing trunk vs patched cdebconf) Will hopefully try to understand how sizes are computed early next week. That still does not explain

Bug#416543: [newt] Last letter of the title is cut

2007-04-01 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 01 April 2007 18:16, Davide Viti wrote: TITLE_PADDING is 8 and is currently computed counting the following chars: 6 - ┌┤ [!] 2 - ├┐ No, actually it is (look at the comment): 1 - ┤ 6 - [!!] 1 - ├ (IIRC [!!] is used for error dialogs.) The comment does not mention the space

Bug#416543: [newt] Last letter of the title is cut

2007-04-01 Thread Davide Viti
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: On Sunday 01 April 2007 18:16, Davide Viti wrote: TITLE_PADDING is 8 and is currently computed counting the following chars: 6 - ┌┤ [!] 2 - ├┐ No, actually it is (look at the comment): 1 - ┤ 6 - [!!] 1 - ├ (IIRC

Bug#416543: [newt] Last letter of the title is cut

2007-03-31 Thread Davide Viti
Tags: patch thanks On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 05:13:28AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: This is probably the same issue as in #382278. Not sure why it still does not do the calculation correctly in this case. It could be that #define TITLE_PADDING 8 is still too low, but it would be nice to know why.

Bug#416543: [newt] Last letter of the title is cut

2007-03-31 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 31 March 2007 11:58, Davide Viti wrote: This is probably the same issue as in #382278. Not sure why it still does not do the calculation correctly in this case. It could be that #define TITLE_PADDING 8 is still too low, but it would be nice to know why. Tried to increase it

Processed: Bug#416543: [newt] Last letter of the title is cut

2007-03-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 416543 cdebconf-newt-udeb Bug#416543: last letter of the title is cut Bug reassigned from package `kbd-chooser' to `cdebconf-newt-udeb'. retitle 416543 [newt] Last letter of the title is cut Bug#416543: last letter of the title is cut Changed

Bug#416543: [newt] Last letter of the title is cut

2007-03-28 Thread Frans Pop
reassign 416543 cdebconf-newt-udeb retitle 416543 [newt] Last letter of the title is cut thanks This is probably the same issue as in #382278. Not sure why it still does not do the calculation correctly in this case. It could be that #define TITLE_PADDING 8 is still too low, but it would be