On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 03:30:36PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Ack to commit them.
Applied, thanks.
-- Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HI Otavio,
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 03:30:36PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I'm ok with you pushing it for Beta2 but I'd like that you keep around
> if any issues is discovery with your code changes. I hope we'll be
> able to do a fast Beta2 release and want to avoid too risky changes.
Sure. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 08 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
>> Maybe we can move all things into place after beta1?
>
> Yes, that would be fine IMO, but needs OK from Otavio as another release is
> planned soon after beta1
On Saturday 08 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 05:04:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > It would be great if you could do grub2 support as that would also
> > cover dmraid support with grub2. I originally implemented it, but
> > cannot test it ATM (have a system that suppor
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 05:04:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> It would be great if you could do grub2 support as that would also cover
> dmraid support with grub2. I originally implemented it, but cannot test it
> ATM (have a system that supports it, but no spare SATA disks to play with).
Can you
On Saturday 08 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> Maybe we can move all things into place after beta1?
Yes, that would be fine IMO, but needs OK from Otavio as another release is
planned soon after beta1.
> I'll look into updating partman-multipath with your suggestions
Was wondering when that
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 08:10:46AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Looks fine to me.
Thanks for reviewing. Maybe we can move all things into place after
beta1? I'll look into updating partman-multipath with your suggestions
and hopefully grub2 support until then.
-- Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 11:55:54AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I don't exactly agree about "meaningless". Knowing that WWID means
> "WorldWide IDentifier" helped me to understand that this seems to be a
> generic way to name a multipath device, so expanding the acronym has
> at least some tea
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:34:45PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Of course, GRUB stuff comes pretty late, but it wouldn't really hurst
> to put "WorldWide IDentifier" somewhere:
I think it's fine to put this in the manual but people not knowing what
a WWID is will have a hard time to even set u
On Saturday 08 March 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I don't exactly agree about "meaningless". Knowing that WWID means
> "WorldWide IDentifier" helped me to understand that this seems to be a
> generic way to name a multipath device, so expanding the acronym has
> at least some teaching benefit.
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Friday 07 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> > I cleaned that up - most of was came in due copy paste from other places
> > in the file. Thanks again for the comments, a new version is attached.
>
> Looks fine to me.
>
> I'm not sure that I agree with C
On Friday 07 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> I cleaned that up - most of was came in due copy paste from other places
> in the file. Thanks again for the comments, a new version is attached.
Looks fine to me.
I'm not sure that I agree with Christian [1] about expanding WWID. I would
say that
Quoting Guido Günther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> +# :sl3:
> +_Description: Install the GRUB boot loader to the multipath device?
> + Installation of GRUB on multipath is experimental.
> + .
> + GRUB is always installed to the master boot record (MBR) of the multipath
> + device. It is also assumed tha
Hi Frans,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:16:17PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> In general I'm not sure that this approach is correct. In the case of SATA
> RAID, the BIOS actually knows what the RAID devices are and the RAID device
> _is_ what you select in the BIOS as the "disk" to be booted from.
In the
On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Guido Günther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > +# :sl3:
> > +_Description: Install the GRUB boot loader to the multipath device?
> > + Installation of GRUB on multipath is experimental.
>
> I'm not very keen to add warnings about experimental fea
Quoting Guido Günther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> +# :sl3:
> +_Description: Install the GRUB boot loader to the multipath device?
> + Installation of GRUB on multipath is experimental.
I'm not very keen to add warnings about experimental features in the
templates. Will we remember about removing them
On Saturday 01 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> attached is a first version of multipath support for grub-install to get
> some comments. It basically uses the sataraid code.
In general I'm not sure that this approach is correct. In the case of SATA
RAID, the BIOS actually knows what the RAID de
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 07:57:15PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> attached is a first version of multipath support for grub-install to get
> some comments. It basically uses the sataraid code. The current code
...as Frans pointed out I forgot the attachment.
-- Guido
>From b36dac79b414d9a9b472f32ee
Package: grub-installer
Version: 1.29
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
attached is a first version of multipath support for grub-install to get
some comments. It basically uses the sataraid code. The current code
has:
- if ... [ $frgrubroot -gt 0 ] && [ -e $ROOT$frdev$frbootpart ]; then
which
19 matches
Mail list logo
