Bug#561008: console-setup: approximations for 'toilet -f future' symbols look different before and after X

2010-01-16 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:07:55 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote: On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 06:40:25PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: Hence, it seems that this bug should be fixed in xserver-xorg-video-intel. If this is the case, I think the bug report should be reassigned to package

Bug#561008: console-setup: approximations for 'toilet -f future' symbols look different before and after X

2010-01-16 Thread Anton Zinoviev
reassign 561008 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.1-1 thank you On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:24:14PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: I have just performed the test you requested, and I can confirm that lat1u-16.psf.gz is OK (without X). Then I am reassigning to xserver-xorg-video-intel. Anton

Processed: Re: Bug#561008: console-setup: approximations for 'toilet -f future' symbols look different before and after X

2010-01-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 561008 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.1-1 Bug #561008 [console-setup] console-setup: approximations for 'toilet -f future' symbols look different before and after X Bug reassigned from package 'console-setup' to

Bug#561008: console-setup: approximations for 'toilet -f future' symbols look different before and after X

2010-01-14 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 06:40:25PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: Hence, it seems that this bug should be fixed in xserver-xorg-video-intel. If this is the case, I think the bug report should be reassigned to package xserver-xorg-video-intel, version 2:2.9.1-1 . Do you want me to

Bug#561008: console-setup: approximations for 'toilet -f future' symbols look different before and after X

2010-01-06 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:49:36 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:45:35 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:01:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] I suppose that only the horizontal lines are broken (the vertical are OK)? Bingo! You

Bug#561008: console-setup: approximations for 'toilet -f future' symbols look different before and after X

2009-12-18 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:45:35 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:01:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] I had tried with 'showcfont', but I thought it didn't do what you wanted. Instead of telling me the name of the used font (as I expected), it wrote a complete

Bug#561008: console-setup: approximations for 'toilet -f future' symbols look different before and after X

2009-12-15 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:01:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: The equivalent command is 'showcfont' but it doesn't work on my machine (outdated version of Debian unstable). I had tried with 'showcfont', but I thought it didn't do what you wanted. Instead of telling me the name of the

Bug#561008: console-setup: approximations for 'toilet -f future' symbols look different before and after X

2009-12-14 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 05:35:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote: OK, after that, I start an X session: $ startx logout If I switch back to the console (by pressing [Ctrl+Alt+F1]) and I login again, then the output of $ toilet -f future hello ╻ ╻┏━╸╻ ╻ ┏━┓ ┣━┫┣╸ ┃

Bug#561008: console-setup: approximations for 'toilet -f future' symbols look different before and after X

2009-12-14 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:19:55 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 05:35:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote: [...] If I switch back to the console (by pressing [Ctrl+Alt+F1]) and I login again, then the output of $ toilet -f future hello [...] looks different!

Bug#561008: console-setup: approximations for 'toilet -f future' symbols look different before and after X

2009-12-14 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 08:08:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: No, I cannot: this command belongs to the kbd package, but I do not have this package installed on any of the Debian boxes I use. Should I switch from console-tools to kbd, in your opinion? Console-tools has several bugs that

Bug#561008: console-setup: approximations for 'toilet -f future' symbols look different before and after X

2009-12-14 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:02:53 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 08:08:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: No, I cannot: this command belongs to the kbd package, but I do not have this package installed on any of the Debian boxes I use. Should I switch from

Bug#561008: console-setup: approximations for 'toilet -f future' symbols look different before and after X

2009-12-13 Thread Francesco Poli (t1000)
Package: console-setup Version: 1.50 Severity: normal Hi (again)! During the discussions for bug #546983, console-setup was greatly improved by Anton Zinoviev (which I would like to thank again): the console is now able to display 'toilet -f future' symbols in a strange, yet charming way, by