Hello,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
If we still want to keep cfdisk in d-i, then we should reassign this
bug to libncurses5, asking for the creation of a udeb.
But, do we want to keep a udeb of cfdisk?
I see no reason to maintain a udeb for
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:57:59PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
If we still want to keep cfdisk in d-i, then we should reassign this
bug to libncurses5, asking for the creation of a udeb.
But, do we
In testing daily builds, cfdisk is no more usable, because
libncurses is missing.
In preparation of squeeze release, the package dependencies
of cfdisk have been changed, a Depends to libncurses5 has been
added, but there is no udeb existing for libncurses5.
So, cfdisk is useless for d-i ATM.
Quoting Holger Wansing (li...@wansing-online.de):
In testing daily builds, cfdisk is no more usable, because
libncurses is missing.
In preparation of squeeze release, the package dependencies
of cfdisk have been changed, a Depends to libncurses5 has been
added, but there is no udeb existing
4 matches
Mail list logo
