On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:58, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Gyorgy Jeney writes:
>
>> On 24 November 2010 21:54, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>> Gyorgy Jeney writes:
>>>
On 24 November 2010 20:25, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> # sed -i '/^timeout/s/0/50/' /mnt/syslinux.cfg
> # umount /mnt
>>>
Gyorgy Jeney writes:
> On 24 November 2010 21:54, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Gyorgy Jeney writes:
>>
>>> On 24 November 2010 20:25, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>>
# sed -i '/^timeout/s/0/50/' /mnt/syslinux.cfg
# umount /mnt
and then try to boot the installer from the pendrive. No
On 24 November 2010 21:54, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Gyorgy Jeney writes:
>
>> On 24 November 2010 20:25, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>> # sed -i '/^timeout/s/0/50/' /mnt/syslinux.cfg
>>> # umount /mnt
>>>
>>> and then try to boot the installer from the pendrive. Now it should
>>> automatically choose t
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 02:49, Gyorgy Jeney wrote:
> On 23 November 2010 23:52, Gene Cumm wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 14:48, Gyorgy Jeney wrote:
>>> But then I noticed that I wasn't following the (debian) instructions
>>> properly and I was writing the image to /dev/sde, instead of
>>> /de
Gyorgy Jeney writes:
> On 24 November 2010 20:25, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> György, could you please make sure that it's a keyboard issue only, for
>> example by introducing a short timeout by replacing "timeout 0" with
>> "timeout 50" in syslinux.cfg? If your pendrive is /dev/sde, then do
>>
>
On 24 November 2010 20:25, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> "H. Peter Anvin" writes:
>
>> On 11/24/2010 07:34 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>> Syslinux certainly used to work partitionless. Maybe this feature was
>>> inadvertently lost during the major version change... Peter?
>>
>> It's possible... it's
"H. Peter Anvin" writes:
> On 11/24/2010 07:34 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Syslinux certainly used to work partitionless. Maybe this feature was
>> inadvertently lost during the major version change... Peter?
>
> It's possible... it's also possible there is something in memory which
> looks l
On 24 November 2010 16:34, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Gyorgy Jeney writes:
>
>> On 22 November 2010 22:46, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>> "H. Peter Anvin" writes:
>>>
For a regression... I really need it narrowed down... 3.71 to 4.02 is a
huge change.
>>>
>>> That's of course true. György,
On 11/24/2010 07:34 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
> Syslinux certainly used to work partitionless. Maybe this feature was
> inadvertently lost during the major version change... Peter?
>
It's possible... it's also possible there is something in memory which
looks like a partition handover table.
Gyorgy Jeney writes:
> On 22 November 2010 22:46, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> "H. Peter Anvin" writes:
>>
>>> For a regression... I really need it narrowed down... 3.71 to 4.02 is a
>>> huge change.
>>
>> That's of course true. György, are you willing to test some
>> intermediate syslinux versio
On 23 November 2010 23:52, Gene Cumm wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 14:48, Gyorgy Jeney wrote:
>> But then I noticed that I wasn't following the (debian) instructions
>> properly and I was writing the image to /dev/sde, instead of
>> /dev/sde1. As soon as a partition was created, an appropriat
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 14:48, Gyorgy Jeney wrote:
> On 22 November 2010 22:46, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>> "H. Peter Anvin" writes:
>>
>>> For a regression... I really need it narrowed down... 3.71 to 4.02 is a
>>> huge change.
>>
>> That's of course true. György, are you willing to test some
>> i
On 22 November 2010 22:46, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> "H. Peter Anvin" writes:
>
>> For a regression... I really need it narrowed down... 3.71 to 4.02 is a
>> huge change.
>
> That's of course true. György, are you willing to test some
> intermediate syslinux versions on this machine?
I checked out
"H. Peter Anvin" writes:
> For a regression... I really need it narrowed down... 3.71 to 4.02 is a
> huge change.
That's of course true. György, are you willing to test some
intermediate syslinux versions on this machine? They are distributed
precompiled at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/util
On 11/22/2010 09:24 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> "H. Peter Anvin" writes:
>
>> On 11/21/2010 12:31 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>
>>> Does this report ring a bell here? I didn't check, but the image should
>>> carry an isohybridized 4.02 version of isolinux. The working (lenny)
>>> version is 3.71.
On 11/21/2010 12:31 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>Hi,
>
> Does this report ring a bell here? I didn't check, but the image should
> carry an isohybridized 4.02 version of isolinux. The working (lenny)
> version is 3.71.
>
> Thanks,
> Feri.
This often happens when the BIOS doesn't h
"H. Peter Anvin" writes:
> On 11/21/2010 12:31 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Does this report ring a bell here? I didn't check, but the image should
>> carry an isohybridized 4.02 version of isolinux. The working (lenny)
>> version is 3.71.
>
> This often happens when the BIOS doesn't have "US
17 matches
Mail list logo
