A Domingo 12 Dezembro 2010 00:12:19 Floris Bos você escreveu:
> On Saturday, December 11, 2010 07:31:48 am Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Correct. Apparently, though, that behaviour didn't bother anybody
> > enough to look at current netcfg code and propose the needed patch
>
> Fair enough.
>
> Att
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 01:12:19AM +0100, Floris Bos wrote:
> On Saturday, December 11, 2010 07:31:48 am Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Correct. Apparently, though, that behaviour didn't bother anybody
> > enough to look at current netcfg code and propose the needed patch
>
> Fair enough.
>
> Attac
On Saturday, December 11, 2010 07:31:48 am Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Correct. Apparently, though, that behaviour didn't bother anybody
> enough to look at current netcfg code and propose the needed patch
Fair enough.
Attached a patch that introduces a new netcfg/hostname option that -if set-
ta
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 343269 606636
Bug#343269: hostname/domain name preseeding is quite broken
Bug#606636: Reverse DNS takes precedence over netcfg/get_hostname
Forcibly Merged 343269 606636.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
forcemerge 343269 606636
thanks
Quoting Floris Bos (b...@je-eigen-domein.nl):
> Guess it wasn't good enough 5 years ago either. :-)
> Seems my bug is a duplicate of:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=343269
Correct. Apparently, though, that behaviour didn't bother anybody
enoug
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 09:53:42PM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Floris Bos writes:
> > Not everyone has the power to change their own reverse DNS entries, or it
> > might take time to process (send a request to the upstream provider that is
> > responsible for the IP block, wait for them to pro
On Friday, December 10, 2010 09:53:42 pm Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> > Not everyone has the power to change their own reverse DNS entries, or it
> > might take time to process (send a request to the upstream provider that
> > is responsible for the IP block, wait for them to process it, and reload
> > t
Floris Bos writes:
> On Friday, December 10, 2010 05:17:15 pm Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Floris Bos writes:
>>
>>> The value specified using "netcfg/get_hostname" seems to be ignored, if a
>>> reverse DNS entry is present for the IP-address of the server being
>>> installed. [...]
>>> I think net
Hi,
On Friday, December 10, 2010 05:17:15 pm Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Floris Bos writes:
> > The value specified using "netcfg/get_hostname" seems to be ignored, if a
> > reverse DNS entry is present for the IP-address of the server being
> > installed. [...]
> > I think netcfg/get_hostname should
Floris Bos writes:
> The value specified using "netcfg/get_hostname" seems to be ignored, if a
> reverse DNS entry is present for the IP-address of the server being installed.
> [...]
> I think netcfg/get_hostname should take precendence over everything else.
Half of the current behaviour is do
Package: netcfg
Version: 1.46
The value specified using "netcfg/get_hostname" seems to be ignored, if a
reverse DNS entry is present for the IP-address of the server being installed.
Seems to be a bit similar to this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544513 (dhcp returned h
11 matches
Mail list logo
