Processed: Re: Bug#666399: s390-dasd fails to work with >20 devices visible (mostly in LPAR mode)

2016-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #666399 [s390-dasd] s390-dasd fails to work with >20 devices visible (mostly in LPAR mode) Added tag(s) patch. -- 666399: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666399 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob

Bug#666399: s390-dasd fails to work with >20 devices visible (mostly in LPAR mode)

2016-02-26 Thread Hendrik Brueckner
Control: tags -1 + patch On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 06:22:30PM +0100, Hendrik Brueckner wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 05:34:02PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Hendrik Brueckner wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 05:46:39PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > > > For example, > > > > > > > > >

Bug#666399: s390-dasd fails to work with >20 devices visible (mostly in LPAR mode)

2016-02-16 Thread Hendrik Brueckner
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 05:34:02PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hendrik Brueckner wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 05:46:39PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > > For example, > > > > > > > > cio_ignore=all,!ipldev,!condev,!0.0.da00-0.0.da10 > > > > > > > > ignores all devices except t

Bug#666399: s390-dasd fails to work with >20 devices visible (mostly in LPAR mode)

2016-02-16 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Hendrik Brueckner wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 05:46:39PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > For example, > > > > > > cio_ignore=all,!ipldev,!condev,!0.0.da00-0.0.da10 > > > > > > ignores all devices except the console device, the IPL device, and the > > > range of devices from 0.0.da00

Bug#666399: s390-dasd fails to work with >20 devices visible (mostly in LPAR mode)

2016-02-14 Thread Hendrik Brueckner
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 05:46:39PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 02:15:10PM +0100, Hendrik Brueckner wrote: > > Honestly, I would propose a different approach to limit the DASD device > > available to the Debian installer. I believe that typical customer > > environments ha

Bug#666399: s390-dasd fails to work with >20 devices visible (mostly in LPAR mode)

2016-02-14 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 02:15:10PM +0100, Hendrik Brueckner wrote: > Honestly, I would propose a different approach to limit the DASD device > available to the Debian installer. I believe that typical customer > environments have set up their LPARs (and z/VM guest virtual machines) > to limi

Bug#666399: s390-dasd fails to work with >20 devices visible (mostly in LPAR mode)

2015-12-16 Thread Hendrik Brueckner
Hi Philipp, Alexander (on CC) just reported ran into the same issue. His system has more than 20 DASDs and the dialog continues to show up. The triggers the special debconf return code and the "hardware-detection" dependency for this module is not satisfied. This reported when starting the par

Bug#666399: s390-dasd fails to work with >20 devices visible (mostly in LPAR mode)

2012-04-04 Thread Philipp Kern
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:32:50AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:52:58PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > I'm not sure about the rationale for this. > s390 system can have hundreds or thousands of DASD devices. With the > text frontend it is simply impossible to display suc

Bug#666399: s390-dasd fails to work with >20 devices visible (mostly in LPAR mode)

2012-04-04 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:52:58PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > I'm not sure about the rationale for this. s390 system can have hundreds or thousands of DASD devices. With the text frontend it is simply impossible to display such a long list, with slang it is just not pretty. So this code should a

Bug#666399: s390-dasd fails to work with >20 devices visible (mostly in LPAR mode)

2012-03-30 Thread Philipp Kern
Package: s390-dasd Version: 0.0.27 Severity: important s390-dasd has the following code snippet in dasd-config.c: | static enum state_wanted get_channel (void) | { | if (di_tree_size (channels) > 20) | return get_channel_input (); | else if (di_tree_size (channels)