Well, I haven't followed this thread and I'm not up on all the
security issues. If there is any action items for boot-floppies
please file an appropriate bug against the package. Patches would be
nice too.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 02:17:03PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > > $ tar ztvf base2_2.tgz | awk '$6 == "./root/" '
> > > > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2000-07-05 19:47:09 ./root/
> > >
> > > maybe this changed. At least a have some slink boxes where 700 was the
> > > default.
> >
> > In
> > > Are you sure?
> > >
> > > $ tar ztvf base2_2.tgz | awk '$6 == "./root/" '
> > > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2000-07-05 19:47:09 ./root/
> >
> > maybe this changed. At least a have some slink boxes where 700 was the
> > default.
>
> Indeed, this changed, and that's not good. Why was
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 02:35:34PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > Well, this is security throught obscurity, and I don't think we
> > > > should encourage it. Privacy and security should be different
> > > > things. While I agree we should fix every security hole, I don't
> > > > think w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 72327 bash
Bug#72327: boot-floppies: doesn't install .bash_logout for root
Bug reassigned from package `boot-floppies' to `bash'.
> retitle 72327 /etc/skel/.bash_logout should not exist
Bug#72327: boot-floppies: doesn't install .bash_logout f
reassign 72327 bash
retitle 72327 /etc/skel/.bash_logout should not exist
thanks
I also wonder why do we need .bash_profile and .bashrc in /etc/skel at all.
Policy says /etc/skel should be as empty as we can make it.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 19:20:02 +0200
F
6 matches
Mail list logo
