Bug#743796: flash-kernel: kirkwood+ should be considered the same as kirkwood

2014-04-06 Thread John Hughes
Package: flash-kernel Version: 3.3+deb7u2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Built a custom kernel with make-kpkg * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? I built it in the directory containing the .git subdirectory

Bug#743796: flash-kernel: kirkwood+ should be considered the same as kirkwood

2014-04-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
John Hughes j...@calva.com (2014-04-06): Package: flash-kernel Version: 3.3+deb7u2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Built a custom kernel with make-kpkg * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? I built

Bug#743796: flash-kernel: kirkwood+ should be considered the same as kirkwood

2014-04-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2014-04-06 at 18:24 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: John Hughes j...@calva.com (2014-04-06): Package: flash-kernel Version: 3.3+deb7u2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Built a custom kernel with make-kpkg * What exactly did