Bug#779890: udhcpd: Support for multiple interfaces/udhcpd processes

2015-03-06 Thread Elliott Mitchell
Grr, final bit of confirmation has a shell quirk show up. I suspect there likely should be more backslashes on the sed command, but the attached is what is confirmed to work. -- (\___(\___(\__ --= 8-) EHM =-- __/)___/)___/) \BS (| ehem+sig...@m5p.com PGP

Bug#779890: udhcpd: Support for multiple interfaces/udhcpd processes

2015-03-06 Thread Elliott Mitchell
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:02:39AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: 06.03.2015 02:57, Elliott Mitchell wrote: The documentation seems to suggest udhcpd can only handle binding to one interface and using one IP address range per udhcpd process. Due to this, it would be handy if Debian's init

Bug#779890: udhcpd: Support for multiple interfaces/udhcpd processes

2015-03-05 Thread Elliott Mitchell
Package: udhcpd Version: 1:1.20.0-7 Severity: wishlist The documentation seems to suggest udhcpd can only handle binding to one interface and using one IP address range per udhcpd process. Due to this, it would be handy if Debian's init scripts had support for starting/stopping multiple udhcpd

Bug#779890: udhcpd: Support for multiple interfaces/udhcpd processes

2015-03-05 Thread Elliott Mitchell
Upon a bit more thinking about the situation, I must suggest the overlapping feature of adding a hook script to allow udhcpd to be started/stopped by `ifupdown` instead of only by init script. This ends up dovetailing into support for multiple interfaces. -- (\___(\___(\__ --= 8-)

Bug#779890: udhcpd: Support for multiple interfaces/udhcpd processes

2015-03-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
06.03.2015 02:57, Elliott Mitchell wrote: Package: udhcpd Version: 1:1.20.0-7 Severity: wishlist The documentation seems to suggest udhcpd can only handle binding to one interface and using one IP address range per udhcpd process. Due to this, it would be handy if Debian's init scripts