Bug#784709: when would blkid success but not filesystem type?

2015-05-26 Thread Karel Zak
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:21:36PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, 21 May 2015 13:07:35 +0200 Karel Zak wrote: > > > The option '-s' does not affect return code ... we have information > > about all (including empty) partitions! > > Ok, I see. Sounds like the proposed patch is appropriate then

Bug#784709: when would blkid success but not filesystem type?

2015-05-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 21 May 2015 13:07:35 +0200 Karel Zak wrote: > The option '-s' does not affect return code ... we have information > about all (including empty) partitions! Ok, I see. Sounds like the proposed patch is appropriate then. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=12;filename=0001-F

Bug#784709: when would blkid success but not filesystem type?

2015-05-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 12:21 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, 21 May 2015 13:07:35 +0200 Karel Zak wrote: > > > The option '-s' does not affect return code ... we have information > > about all (including empty) partitions! > > Ok, I see. Sounds like the proposed patch is appropriate then. > >

Bug#784709: when would blkid success but not filesystem type?

2015-05-21 Thread Karel Zak
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:24:38PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > In https://bugs.debian.org/784709 Jérôme Kieffer wrote: > > > Here is the answer for the 3.16 kernel: > > > > jerome@patagonia:~$ sudo blkid -o value -s TYPE /dev/sdb4 > > jerome@patagonia:~$ echo $? > > 0 > ... > > > > The output is t

Bug#784709: when would blkid success but not filesystem type?

2015-05-21 Thread Paul Wise
In https://bugs.debian.org/784709 Jérôme Kieffer wrote: > Here is the answer for the 3.16 kernel: > > jerome@patagonia:~$ sudo blkid -o value -s TYPE /dev/sdb4 > jerome@patagonia:~$ echo $? > 0 ... > > The output is the same on 3.2, as you can see on attached images. Anyone know when blkid woul