On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:21:36PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2015 13:07:35 +0200 Karel Zak wrote:
>
> > The option '-s' does not affect return code ... we have information
> > about all (including empty) partitions!
>
> Ok, I see. Sounds like the proposed patch is appropriate then
On Thu, 21 May 2015 13:07:35 +0200 Karel Zak wrote:
> The option '-s' does not affect return code ... we have information
> about all (including empty) partitions!
Ok, I see. Sounds like the proposed patch is appropriate then.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=12;filename=0001-F
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 12:21 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2015 13:07:35 +0200 Karel Zak wrote:
>
> > The option '-s' does not affect return code ... we have information
> > about all (including empty) partitions!
>
> Ok, I see. Sounds like the proposed patch is appropriate then.
>
>
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:24:38PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> In https://bugs.debian.org/784709 Jérôme Kieffer wrote:
>
> > Here is the answer for the 3.16 kernel:
> >
> > jerome@patagonia:~$ sudo blkid -o value -s TYPE /dev/sdb4
> > jerome@patagonia:~$ echo $?
> > 0
> ...
> >
> > The output is t
In https://bugs.debian.org/784709 Jérôme Kieffer wrote:
> Here is the answer for the 3.16 kernel:
>
> jerome@patagonia:~$ sudo blkid -o value -s TYPE /dev/sdb4
> jerome@patagonia:~$ echo $?
> 0
...
>
> The output is the same on 3.2, as you can see on attached images.
Anyone know when blkid woul
5 matches
Mail list logo