Re: Bug#83608: [PATCH]: modutils-udeb for debian-installer

2001-01-29 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously David Whedon wrote: We're really strapped for space trying to fit all on a single floppy. We have to carefully consider the 10k that using modprobe will cost us. Is it possible for you to elaborate on why you don't want us to use insmod. We really only need it to insmod a nic

Re: Bug#83608: [PATCH]: modutils-udeb for debian-installer

2001-01-29 Thread David Whedon
Okay, using modprobe is a good idea. I have a new patch to modutils; it includes modprobe and is attached. Thanks, -David Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:47:38PM +0100 wrote: Previously David Whedon wrote: We're really strapped for space trying to fit all on a single floppy. We have to

Re: Bug#83608: [PATCH]: modutils-udeb for debian-installer

2001-01-26 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously David Whedon wrote: Here's a patch to make a udeb of modutils for debian-installer. It is still possible that we will use busybox 'insmod', however busybox 'insmod' doesn't currently support all our targetted archs. In its current form this udeb contains only the insmod binary.