Hi,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:27:42AM -0700, Jose R R wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Jose R R (2017-03-29):
>>
>>> "We also encourage installation reports to be sent even if the
>>> installation is successful, so that we
Niltze,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jose R R (2017-03-29):
>> With all due respect, 99% of the build code for the debian-installer
>> is yours. As well as the build pulls 99% UDEBs from official debian
>> repositories.
Hi,
Jose R R (2017-03-29):
> With all due respect, 99% of the build code for the debian-installer
> is yours. As well as the build pulls 99% UDEBs from official debian
> repositories.
That doesn't mean that everything built on top of it has to be reported
on Debian mailing
Niltze,
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Metztli Information Technology (2017-03-27):
>> Boot method: CD/USB
>> Image version: https://metztli.it/readOnlyEphemeral/xiuhcohuatl.iso built on
>> Mar 25 08:35 (2017)
>> Date:
Hi,
Metztli Information Technology (2017-03-27):
> Boot method: CD/USB
> Image version: https://metztli.it/readOnlyEphemeral/xiuhcohuatl.iso built on
> Mar 25 08:35 (2017)
> Date: Mar 26, 2017, 01:49
A couple of months ago, I asked:
| Do we need to get installation reports
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this
6 matches
Mail list logo