Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 3.60
Bug #972076 [tasksel] tasksel suggests the use of mktemp instead of tempfile
Marked as fixed in versions tasksel/3.60.
--
972076: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972076
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: fixed -1 3.60
Hi Sven,
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 08:14:56PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> > tasksel builds fine with Sven's "tempfile -> mktemp" patch applied, so any
> > objections against this?
>
> Just pushed.
Could you confirm that the version Holdger
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> Sven Joachim wrote:
> > > ends successfully, but with a warning:
> > > WARNING: tempfile is deprecated; consider using mktemp instead.
> >
> > The warning comes from tempfile itself, added in debianutils 4.10. The
> > obvious, but untested
Hi,
Sven Joachim wrote:
> > ends successfully, but with a warning:
> > WARNING: tempfile is deprecated; consider using mktemp instead.
>
> The warning comes from tempfile itself, added in debianutils 4.10. The
> obvious, but untested attached patch fixes that, although it might
Control: severity -1 minor
Control: tags -1 patch
Am 12.10.2020 um 10:45 schrieb Markus Steinko:
> Package: tasksel
> Version: 3.59
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where
> appropriate ***
>
> * What led up to the
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 minor
Bug #972076 [tasksel] tasksel suggests the use of mktemp instead of tempfile
Severity set to 'minor' from 'normal'
> tags -1 patch
Bug #972076 [tasksel] tasksel suggests the use of mktemp instead of tempfile
Added tag(s) patch.
--
972076:
Package: tasksel
Version: 3.59
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where
appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Using tasksel to install some task, or with the --new-install
option
ends successfully, but
7 matches
Mail list logo
