Re: Epochs in git tags

2017-12-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 08 Dec 2017, Christian PERRIER wrote: > It seems that debcommit changed its way to tags releases with an > epoch: up to recently, the epoch was just dropped, but now it is used, > but ":" is replaced by "%" > > That indeed explains why I "suddenly" changed my tagging method > without

Re: Epochs in git tags

2017-12-07 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > Cyril Brulebois (2017-12-03): > > However, when changing the way you tag stuff in git, please discuss or > > at least coordinate these workflow changes. Some of our tools currently > > assume epochs are not represented in git tags, which breaks at least

Re: Epochs in git tags (was: apt-setup_0.132_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable)

2017-12-03 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > As usual, thanks for the l10n-related uploads. > > However, when changing the way you tag stuff in git, please discuss or > at least coordinate these workflow changes. Some of our tools currently > assume epochs are not represented in git tags, which b

Re: Epochs in git tags

2017-12-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (2017-12-03): > However, when changing the way you tag stuff in git, please discuss or > at least coordinate these workflow changes. Some of our tools currently > assume epochs are not represented in git tags, which breaks at least > l10n stat computing, but maybe other things as w

Epochs in git tags (was: apt-setup_0.132_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable)

2017-12-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Christian, Debian FTP Masters (2017-11-27): > Accepted: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Format: 1.8 > Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 07:40:54 +0100 > Source: apt-setup > Binary: apt-setup-udeb apt-mirror-setup apt-cdrom-setup > Architecture: source > Version: 1:0.132 > Dist