Otavio Salvador wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is someone still working on this? Would a gparted-like partitioner be
useful for post-etch? (That's basically a lot of GTK programming, i
could work on it too)
Another solution is to use gparted and the C++ libraries which go with
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 22:55, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
Is either that or having a great installer which sucks just because we
have a _really_ crappy partitioner. And I don't think anybody can
argue, while being serious, that we didn't have lots of reports
complaining about the partitioner
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:55:03PM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
AFAIR, the reason why C++ is not supported in D-I is because the
maintainer of libc++ didn't answer to the request to create udebs... and
not having libc++ in D-I just because the maintainer didn't created
udebs is another proof
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 11:09:35AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
For your information: it was exactly mails like this that got Sven's
commit rights revoked. Please don't follow his example.
Ah, ok, nice to get this finally in written. So finally, i was right when i
claimed that my commit rights
Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 22:55, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
Is either that or having a great installer which sucks just because we
have a _really_ crappy partitioner. And I don't think anybody can
argue, while being serious, that we didn't have lots of reports
complaining about
On Thursday 19 October 2006 15:44, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
True, this was not constructive... but honestly I didn't saw my remark
as crapping on things;
I call this crapping on things:
Is either that or having a great installer which sucks just because
we have a _really_ crappy partitioner.
Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 19 October 2006 15:44, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
True, this was not constructive... but honestly I didn't saw my remark
as crapping on things;
I call this crapping on things:
Is either that or having a great installer which sucks just because
we have a _really_ crappy
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 04:08:52PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Sure, creation was requested, but the request to create the udebs was done
by Sven without the agreement from the rest of the d-i team and even
while he knew that people were in general opposed to the idea.
Just to make things
On Thursday 19 October 2006 16:20, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
OK, I see your point, still I am entitled to an opinion which is based
on the experiences I tried with newbies in Debian.
Yes, you are, but only if you express it in a positive, or at least
constructive, way.
Did you let them read the
OK, I see your point, still I am entitled to an opinion which is based
on the experiences I tried with newbies in Debian.
Yes, you are, but only if you express it in a positive, or at least
constructive, way.
k
Did you let them read the installation guide?
No, for two reasons, one,
Julien Goodwin wrote:
D-I pre-RC1 test (2006-10-17)
These are my notes/ideas after having done a test installation using the
graphical d-i. (Under a VMware install using my ISP mirror)
I'm not subscribed to the list so please cc me on anything you'd like my
comment on. I'm happy to test any
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 11:06, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
-- D-I needs a password widget (er, seems to have one, the crypto lvm
just doesn't use it)
DEBCONF protocol allows PASSWORD questions, and the GTK frontend
implements them.
Maybe the crypto lvm is asking passwords using STRING
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 11:06, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
-- For single checkbox option pages (eg Really use block device
encryption) should have a yes/no or more gnome-style (use
encryption/cancel)
I agree, and this is something was already ewquested some times ago
too, i'll open a
On 18/10/2006 7:06 PM, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Julien Goodwin wrote:
D-I pre-RC1 test (2006-10-17)
These are my notes/ideas after having done a test installation using the
graphical d-i. (Under a VMware install using my ISP mirror)
I'm not subscribed to the list so please cc me on
David Härdeman wrote:
On Wed, October 18, 2006 11:06, Attilio Fiandrotti said:
Julien Goodwin wrote:
-- D-I needs a password widget (er, seems to have one, the crypto lvm
just doesn't use it)
DEBCONF protocol allows PASSWORD questions, and the GTK frontend
implements them.
Maybe the crypto
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 11:38, Julien Goodwin wrote:
-- D-I needs a password widget (er, seems to have one, the crypto
lvm just doesn't use it)
DEBCONF protocol allows PASSWORD questions, and the GTK frontend
implements them.
Maybe the crypto lvm is asking passwords using STRING
On 11:06 Wed 18 Oct , Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Sub-optimality of standard partitioner is something i've heard many
people complaining about.
I know xavier oswald once started porting gparted from c++ to plain c: i
checked out the svn repo some times ago and found a lot of code was
On Wed, October 18, 2006 11:06, Attilio Fiandrotti said:
Julien Goodwin wrote:
-- D-I needs a password widget (er, seems to have one, the crypto lvm
just doesn't use it)
DEBCONF protocol allows PASSWORD questions, and the GTK frontend
implements them.
Maybe the crypto lvm is asking
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:06:08AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
-- *Useless* with the current partitioner
Sub-optimality of standard partitioner is something i've heard many
people complaining about.
I know xavier oswald once started porting gparted from c++ to plain c: i
checked out
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:06:08AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
-- *Useless* with the current partitioner
Sub-optimality of standard partitioner is something i've heard many
people complaining about.
I know xavier oswald once started porting
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:06:08AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
-- *Useless* with the current partitioner
Sub-optimality of standard partitioner is something i've heard many
people complaining about.
I know xavier oswald
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:38:50 +1000 Julien Goodwin wrote:
-- A double-click on an entry in the list view doesn't execute the option
Uhm, this looks like the solved bug #382357 and merged ones: did you use
a recent image for testing?
Nightly as downloaded on 2006-10-17 from:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:49:00PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:06:08AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
-- *Useless* with the current partitioner
Sub-optimality of standard partitioner is something i've heard many
D-I pre-RC1 test (2006-10-17)
These are my notes/ideas after having done a test installation using the
graphical d-i. (Under a VMware install using my ISP mirror)
I'm not subscribed to the list so please cc me on anything you'd like my
comment on. I'm happy to test any betas etc to see how
24 matches
Mail list logo
