Bug#230440: marked as done (FWD: Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed)

2004-06-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FWD: Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=6Vw0j8UKbyX0bfpA Content-Disposition

Bug#230440: FWD: Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-05-31 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On 27.V.2004 at 13:55 (+0200) Yann Dirson wrote: Then partition objects in memory should probably be initialized as having no fs on them, instead of looking up the disk. This is exactly what the newer versions of partman do. Or, maybe better, they could be initialized from disk only if the

Bug#230440: FWD: Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-05-27 Thread Yann Dirson
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 02:17:50PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: As I attempt to do more not-so-uncommon things (with the 2004-01-03 snapshot)... This is very old now can you please try a new image from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and see if that works better?

Bug#230440: FWD: Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-05-26 Thread Martin Michlmayr
As I attempt to do more not-so-uncommon things (with the 2004-01-03 snapshot)... This is very old now can you please try a new image from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and see if that works better? - I initially have a HD with a single ext3 partition + swap (from a

Bug#230440: FWD: Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-01-30 Thread Joey Hess
PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:41:51 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed As I attempt to do more not-so-uncommon things (with the 2004-01-03 snapshot)... - I initially have a HD with a single ext3 partition + swap (from a previous RH install

INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-01-12 Thread Yann Dirson
INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/20040109/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Date: 2004-01-12 Method: boot off CD, net boot, proxied http, sarge install Machine: custom Processor: celeron 350 Memory: XXX Root Device: IDE (hda1) Root

Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-01-12 Thread Yann Dirson
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 12:46:01PM +0100, ydirson wrote: Comments/Problems: Partition hard drives: if I just follow the steps lineraly, no problem. At first, I had hit cancel at some point before (have to check and reproduce), and the HD selection menu was incomplete (did not mention the

Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-01-12 Thread Yann Dirson
Ah, I forgot to fill some boxes On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 12:46:01PM +0100, ydirson wrote: Memory: 192MB Root Size/partition table: single ~9GB root, 512M swap And to mention yet other problems: - the items in the initial language menu all start with choose this or a translation of it, which

Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-01-12 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Yann Dirson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): - the items in the initial language menu all start with choose this or a translation of it, which makes it impossible to quickly jump to a particular language with one keystroke, as was possible in old installer I've proposed a new prospective

Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-01-12 Thread Yann Dirson
As I attempt to do more not-so-uncommon things (with the 2004-01-03 snapshot)... - I initially have a HD with a single ext3 partition + swap (from a previous RH install). If I repartition by deleting the ext3 and repartitionning that space in 2, on the partition setup screen I notice the 1st

Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-01-12 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Yann Dirson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I won't anwser to all of these. Only those I have a kind of answer or something to add. BTW, is it wise at all to use devfs, which is tagged as OBSOLETE in 2.6 !? I have the same objection. This breaks out from woody AND from next release. The

Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-01-12 Thread Denis Barbier
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:40:07PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: [...] - in the list of country to select mirrors from (and possibly other lists), when using french as a language, the coutries are not sorted according to their translation, but appear to be sorted by their english name,

Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-01-12 Thread Joey Hess
Yann Dirson wrote: I could find nothing obviously alarming on this subject in syslog, although there are many broken dependency reported all around. I saved the syslog through nc (hopefully installed by a previous run on the target HD, kudos to you for having put it here ;) nc is not