Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:32:15 +
with message-id 4f3aeeff.3060...@debianpt.org
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #644715,
regarding installation-report: general
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.1.8-2
ii reportbug 6.3.1
installation-report suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:55:59 +
with message-id 1326952559.8004.10.camel@deadeye
and subject line Re: Bug#545933: More information
has caused the Debian Bug report #545933,
regarding Installation-Report: Dell Optiplex 745 USB keyboard not recognized
to be marked as done
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.orgwrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 23:35:50 +, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
On 10-01-2012 13:30, Luk Claes wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.45
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
When I tried the
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 14:56:36 +0530, Prema wrote:
Why graphics drivers are removed .,is there any plans to include them in
near future?
Because they're not useful, and not AFAIK.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 23:35:50 +, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
On 10-01-2012 13:30, Luk Claes wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.45
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
When I tried the graphical install, it just hang.
So I continued with the non-graphical install.
Hi,
[...]
kernel graphics drivers aren't included in d-i, so blacklisting them
won't help you.
You're right. Actually the reported errors are on booting for the 1st
time after installing.
--
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,
Miguel Figueiredo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.45
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
When I tried the graphical install, it just hang.
So I continued with the non-graphical install.
After partitioning (choosing btrfs for all but the swap partition),
when installing the base system the root
On 10-01-2012 13:30, Luk Claes wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.45
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
When I tried the graphical install, it just hang.
So I continued with the non-graphical install.
Looks like a kernel module issue. There are several similar reports with
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image
version:www.debian.org/debian-CD/6.0.3/amd64/iso-cd/debian-6.0.3-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: Jan 7 2011 2:00 PM
Machine: Lenovo Thinkpad X220
Partitions: Filesystem Type 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda5 ext3
(x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-12
ii reportbug 6.3
B. Zhang wrote:
The installation (console) by default went well. Thank you.
But to restart, surprise, white screen.
In fact, missing the firmware for the graphics card AMD Radeon HD 6470M, which
was not reported by the installer during installation.
It was not easy for a novice to find and
to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-12
ii reportbug 6.3
installation-report suggests no packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
Package: installation-reports
Severity: wishlist
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-businesscard.iso
28-Oct-2011 05:40 70M +
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2011 21:37:01 +0530
with message-id 20111028160701.gl21...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org
and subject line Re: Bug#646887: installation-reports: No prob, just sending in
testing installation report as asked.
has caused the Debian Bug report #646887,
regarding
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: boot from CD business card image
Image version: daily build 27Oct11
Date: 27Oct11 about 2100 MDT
Machine: Dell D4100 desktop abput 2000 vintage
Processor: Pentium III
Memory: 256 MB
Partitions:
ron@D4100:~$ df -Tl
FilesystemType 1K-blocks
Your message dated Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:57:25 +0530
with message-id 20111029042725.gf5...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org
and subject line Re: Bug#646991: Installation report: good install
has caused the Debian Bug report #646991,
regarding Installation report: good install
to be marked as done
stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=nl_NL.utf8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions
#286349,
regarding installation-report: successfully (only some comments on cd-rom and
german typos)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem
reassign 637808 libpango1.0-udeb
forcemerge 637289 637808
thanks
Hello,
Vasudev Kamath, le Sun 14 Aug 2011 23:13:07 +0530, a écrit :
I had filed a successful installation report for Acer Travelmate [1] I had
used
text installer for this. But when I tried using the Graphical installer
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 637808 libpango1.0-udeb
Bug #637808 [installation-reports] installation-report: Graphical Installer
doesn't work properly on Acer Travelmate 4740Z
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'libpango1.0-udeb'.
Bug No longer
Quoting Vasudev Kamath (kamathvasu...@gmail.com):
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.45
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
Hello,
I had filed a successful installation report for Acer Travelmate [1] I had
used
text installer for this. But when I tried using the Graphical installer
If someone has a virtual machine system handy, trying to locate when the
problem appeared would be nice, e.g. using the dailies.
Images downloaded through http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/
Tested with VirtualBox 4.1 on a Debian sid install on amd64.
I've used the testing
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.45
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
Hello,
I had filed a successful installation report for Acer Travelmate [1] I had used
text installer for this. But when I tried using the Graphical installer for
Xfce4 and graphical installer came up with square boxes
Sure did...
See bug #636269.
Enjoy!
Rick
On Aug 13, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:15, Rick Thomas rbtho...@pobox.com wrote:
Install went without a hitch until it came time to reboot into the
newly
installed system.
Did you try to install a more
Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com (14/08/2011):
I had filed a successful installation report for Acer Travelmate [1] I
had used text installer for this. But when I tried using the Graphical
installer for Xfce4 and graphical installer came up with square boxes,
no readable fonts
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:15, Rick Thomas rbtho...@pobox.com wrote:
Install went without a hitch until it came time to reboot into the newly
installed system.
Did you try to install a more recent image? If don't, could you give
it a new try and send us the syslog (gzipped) thus we can guess
, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii
Your message dated Sun, 7 Aug 2011 20:03:43 +0200
with message-id 20110807180343.ga15...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org
and subject line Re: Bug#636982: installation-report: another flawless victory
has caused the Debian Bug report #636982,
regarding installation-report: another flawless victory
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-businesscard.iso
Date: 2011-07-24 16:00 CEST
Machine: Built from component parts
Processor: Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5200 2500GHz
Memory:
In contrast to Jeroen's report that Wheezy installation went fine on
G3 Mac...
I just tried the sid_d-i testing daily businesscard. (details of
exactly which iso are available on request)
Install went without a hitch until it came time to reboot into the
newly installed system.
The
).
Rick
I tried installing sid_d-i in expert mode so I could get it to install
Sid versions of the yaboot-related stuff.
No go.
I filed an installation report with a full set of logs. Bug#636269
Hope it helps!
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
OK,
I downloaded
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/sid_d-i/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-testing-powerpc-businesscard.iso
Daily build #5 for powerpc, using installer build from sid
These images will install the testing version of Debian, currently
Wheezy.
...
This
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 02:18:29AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
After booting the CD, there were a lot of messages that scrolled by
too fast to get details, but all of them seemed to have something to
do with missing some UTF8 localization stuff.
This is the cause of everything else. I *think*
Hi David, Hi Colin,
On Jul 29, 2011, at 12:35 PM, David Ricar wrote:
On 07/29/2011 08:18 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
After booting the CD, there were a lot of messages that scrolled by
too
fast to get details, but all of them seemed to have something to do
with
missing some UTF8
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 20:59, Rick Thomas rbtho...@pobox.com wrote:
Colin, do you have any idea when your fix will be available for testing?
Can you let me know when it happens?
It is just a matter of waiting a cuple of days. If it doesn't work we
can check the build log and see if it has
OK.
I'll try again on Monday or Tuesday (busy weekend coming up).
Rick
On Jul 29, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 20:59, Rick Thomas rbtho...@pobox.com wrote:
Colin, do you have any idea when your fix will be available for
testing?
Can you let me know
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:47:20 +
with message-id e1qm7gs-0003a8...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#597223: fixed in partman-target 75
has caused the Debian Bug report #597223,
regarding Installation Report - USB install leaves bogus /etc/fstab file wrt
cdrom
to be marked
/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-11 Linux PCI Utilities
ii reportbug 5.1.1 reports bugs in the Debian distrib
installation-report suggests no packages
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jul 2011 22:55:55 +0200
with message-id 2011072420.gb5...@const.dc0b.debconf.org
and subject line Re: Bug#635282: installation-report: successfully installed
Debian GNU/Hurd
has caused the Debian Bug report #635282,
regarding installation-report: successfully
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:02:21 +
with message-id e1qkfan-0002ed...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#612111: fixed in kernel-wedge 2.78
has caused the Debian Bug report #612111,
regarding installation-report: kernel module wistron_btns.ko missing
to be marked as done
I expect the ata errors are happening because of the disk on which
debian was installed. It's in a drive sled and recently I asked a
sighted friend to check the drive sled out and was told nothing is wrong
with the drive sled. Another drive sled that goes in the same slot on
the same
2.6.39-2-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-10 Linux PCI Utilities
ii
So, was it successful?
If so, great, and we'll happily close the bug report and thank you for
reporting it (we also need successful report, not only issue reports)
Else, please provide details :)
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Mostly successful, alsa can't seem to figure out what sound card I have
but the system still talks. Soud card identification capability was lost
in wheezy and not recovered in sid.On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
So, was it successful?
If so, great, and we'll happily close the
http://www.shellworld.net/~jdashiel/dmesg.log has the current dmesg
output. A little over 50k so I put it on my web page. On Tue, 12 Jul
2011, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically
Jude DaShiell, le Tue 12 Jul 2011 06:32:56 -0400, a écrit :
http://www.shellworld.net/~jdashiel/dmesg.log has the current dmesg
output. A little over 50k so I put it on my web page.
50k is not a problem, so attaching it, so it's not lost.
Samuel
[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:19:42 +0200
with message-id 20110712121942.GA3251@const
and subject line Re: Bug#633620: installation-report: espeakup amdk8 wheezy to
sid
has caused the Debian Bug report #633620,
regarding installation-report: espeakup amdk8 wheezy to sid
to be marked
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:54:25 +0100
with message-id 201107122154.25194.el...@debianpt.org
and subject line Re: Bug#633596: installation-report:
has caused the Debian Bug report #633596,
regarding installation-report:
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils
=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-6 Linux PCI Utilities
ii reportbug 4.12.6 reports bugs
=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-9 Linux PCI Utilities
ii reportbug 5.1.1 reports bugs in the Debian distrib
installation
=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-9 Linux PCI Utilities
ii reportbug 5.1.1 reports bugs in the Debian
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2011 18:55:57 +0200
with message-id 20110526165557.gx3...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org
and subject line Re: Bug#628024: installation-report: Thinkpad x220
installation report -- unstable debian installer
has caused the Debian Bug report #628024,
regarding installation
Hi,
can you send the log (compressed) from the sucessful installation on the same
machine?
There's a line with a failure message from the kernel but i'm not sure this is
the cause (or not).
May 20 08:00:17 kernel: [ 179.918750] mpt2sas0: failure at /build/buildd-
linux-2.6_2.6.32-31-amd64-
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
2011/5/18 Enno Gröper groep...@cms.hu-berlin.de:
...
Installer hangs on Scanning disks... at 50%.
Booting the installer using DRAC and a virtual CD of
debian-6.0.1a-amd64-netinst.iso works.
I'm writing this report on the machine after
to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-6 Linux PCI Utilities
ii reportbug 4.12.6 reports bugs in the Debian distrib
installation-report suggests no packages
Hi,
We need more info on what is happening.
Please send the installation syslog (gzipped).
Thanks!
--
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,
Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
2011/5/18 Enno Gröper groep...@cms.hu-berlin.de:
...
Installer hangs on Scanning disks... at 50%.
Booting the installer using DRAC and a virtual CD of
debian-6.0.1a-amd64-netinst.iso works.
I'm writing this report on the machine after installing using the debian
netinst cd image.
I wasn't
Your message dated Sat, 30 Apr 2011 08:03:51 +0200
with message-id 20110430060351.gl8...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org
and subject line Re: Bug#624601: installation-report: great installation
has caused the Debian Bug report #624601,
regarding installation-report: great installation
to be marked
reassign 624466 xserver-xorg-input-evdev
severity 624466 important
thanks
Quoting Kenneth W Foy Jr (kete...@gmail.com):
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.44
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable
I chose Xfce, and when the GDM login appear, neither my
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 624466 xserver-xorg-input-evdev
Bug #624466 [installation-reports] installation-report: ineffective input
devices and network interface
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to
'xserver-xorg-input-evdev'.
Bug No longer
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 06:38:37 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
I din't really see any of these are harmful.
udev not working is certainly harmful.
The problem apparently lies in X.org input drivers. Hence reassigning
(hopefully to the right package, but I guess the X folks will cope
with
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 06:38:37 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
I din't really see any of these are harmful.
udev not working is certainly harmful.
The problem apparently lies in X.org input drivers. Hence reassigning
(hopefully to the
=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-6 Linux PCI Utilities
ii reportbug 4.12.6 reports bugs in the Debian distrib
-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-9 Linux PCI Utilities
ii reportbug 5.0reports bugs in the Debian distrib
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:34:45 +0100
with message-id 201104282034.45690.el...@debianpt.org
and subject line Re: Bug#624462: installation-report: flawless installation
has caused the Debian Bug report #624462,
regarding installation-report: flawless installation
to be marked as done
, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-7 Linux PCI Utilities
ii reportbug 5.0reports bugs
tags 611108 +moreinfo
clone 611108 -1
reassign -1 save-logs
retitle -1 installer should not suggest to save logs to a media mounted
read-only
severity -1 wishlist
tags -1 d-i
thanks
Matthijs Kooijman a écrit :
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.44
Severity: normal
[…]
I did an
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 611108 +moreinfo
Bug #611108 [installation-reports] installation-report: Succesful install with
some remarks
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
clone 611108 -1
Bug#611108: installation-report: Succesful install with some remarks
Bug 611108 cloned
tags 611108 -moreinfo
reassign 611108 debian-installer
forcemerge 596667 611108
thanks
Matthijs Kooijman a écrit :
After doing the install software step, I left my machine unattended
for a few hours. When I got back and started on the install grub
step, my network connectivity was
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 611108 -moreinfo
Bug #611108 [installation-reports] installation-report: Succesful install with
some remarks
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
reassign 611108 debian-installer
Bug #611108 [installation-reports] installation-report: Succesful install
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 18:25:14 -0500 Rick Thomas wrote:
On Mar 7, 2011, at 3:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 19:17 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Rick Thomas (rbtho...@pobox.com):
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.44
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Rick Thomas wrote:
Well, in the mean-time, there's no way to test new d-i businesscard
or netinst CDs beyond the disk partition step. Or, to put it more
bluntly: Testing grinds to a halt until this is fixed.
Use http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/sid_d-i/current/
--
see shy jo
2.6.32-5-powerpc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-7 Linux PCI Utilities
ii reportbug
Package: installation-reports
Severity: Critical (NOW FIXED.)
Justification: No boot means no system. No boot even with rescue-disk-pc
TITLE: installation-report_No-boot-from-raid-partition-on-beta1
My filename:
issue-instalation-report_No-boot-from-raid-partition-on-beta1-20101208.utf
thank you to whoever, did what.
I saw in the GNU/Linux Debian GRUB 1.99~rc1-3 changelog, so many changes.
I am not sure what you busy people changed to get my situation booting.
I hope this installation-report helps anybody.
Thank you, Regards McTech.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ
reassign 617204 busybox
fixed 617204 1:1.17.1-10
thanks
Quoting Rick Thomas (rbtho...@pobox.com):
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.44
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable
That should be fixed once busybox providing sha256sum reaches testing.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 617204 busybox
Bug #617204 [installation-reports] installation-report: /usr/sbin/debootstrap
reports sha1sum: not found
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'busybox'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.44
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 19:17 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Rick Thomas (rbtho...@pobox.com):
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.44
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable
That should be fixed once busybox providing sha256sum reaches testing.
Your message dated Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:05:28 +
with message-id 201103072205.28711.el...@debianpt.org
and subject line Re: Bug#606416: installation-report ( NOW FIXED.) HPT370 PATA
Boots to ONE disk,NO RAID,using sid (unstable) containing
grub-pc_1.99~rc1.3_i386.deb
has caused the Debian Bug
On Mar 7, 2011, at 3:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 19:17 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Rick Thomas (rbtho...@pobox.com):
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.44
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable
That should be fixed once
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 19:17 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Rick Thomas (rbtho...@pobox.com):
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.44
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable
That should
Quoting Rick Thomas (rbtho...@pobox.com):
Well, in the mean-time, there's no way to test new d-i businesscard
or netinst CDs beyond the disk partition step. Or, to put it more
bluntly: Testing grinds to a halt until this is fixed.
I haven't tried it on a DVD or CD install yet. Is it
'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: USB Stick
Image version: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 03/02/2011
Machine: Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 Quad CPU
Processor: Q6600 @ 2.40 GHz
Memory: 3,50 Go
Partitions: N.A
Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): N.A
Base System Installation
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD Netinstall
Image version: Debian GNU/LINX testing wheezy - official snapshot Multi
Architecture amd64/i386 Net inst #1 20110228-15:35
Date: 28/02/2011
Machine: Dell precision M50
Processor:
Memory: 2Gb
Partitions:
boot 256 Mb ext4
swap 3Gb
LVM
reassign 615948 debootstrap
forcemerge 614315 615948
thanks
Lorenzo Bernardi lorenzo.berna...@lpn.cnrs.fr wrote [2011-03-01]:
I cannot install the base system with the error:
Install the base system
Debootstrap Error
Invalid Release File: no entry for main/binary-386/Packages
While at
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 615948 debootstrap
Bug #615948 [installation-reports] Installation report
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'debootstrap'.
forcemerge 614315 615948
Bug#614315: requires no longer created MD5Sum checksums in Release
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:08:48 +
with message-id 201102131108.48755.el...@debianpt.org
and subject line Re: Bug#613099: installation-reports: Installation Report -
Debian Squeeze 6.0 amd64 cd1 on Thinkpad T61
has caused the Debian Bug report #613099,
regarding installation
Package: installation-reports
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.0/amd64/iso-cd/debian-6.0.0-amd64-CD-1.iso
Date: Date and time of the install
Machine: Lenovo Thinkpad T61
Partitions: df -Tl will do;
Quoting Jimmy Wu (jimmywu...@gmail.com):
1. Might I suggest adding w3m as an optional installer module, at the
very least for the netinst image, so users can authenticate and proceed
with the install. Perhaps this is possible by using the rescue mode of
the CD, but I do not could I have done
Quoting Miguel Figueiredo (el...@debianpt.org):
A Quinta 10 Fevereiro 2011 05:03:21 Christian PERRIER você escreveu:
Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System (ow...@bugs.debian.org):
Thanks for your installation report.
Closing as it was a successful installation.
Come on, it's 2011
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 05:41, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Otavio, Colin, any objection to this?
(cc'ed to get attention, just in case...sorry for the double mail)
Sure not. Seems logical do this move ASAP.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 06:41:43AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Miguel Figueiredo (el...@debianpt.org):
A Quinta 10 Fevereiro 2011 05:03:21 Christian PERRIER você escreveu:
I think we should switch to ext4 as default *now*
+1
Otavio, Colin, any objection to this?
(cc'ed
Am 10.02.2011 06:01, schrieb Christian PERRIER:
ext4 has been activated for the first time in squeeze. As we're not
crazy, nobody in the team imagined a single second to make it the
default. This may change for wheezy.
Ahem, http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SqueezeGoals.
I don't expect
Am 10.02.2011 09:27, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
Ahem, http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SqueezeGoals.
Sorry, please forget about it. I've read it three more times and
realized I must have misinterpreted ext4 support as ext4 by default.
- Fabian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
A Quinta 10 Fevereiro 2011 05:03:21 Christian PERRIER você escreveu:
Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System (ow...@bugs.debian.org):
Thanks for your installation report.
Closing as it was a successful installation.
Come on, it's 2011 and #603084 it's already reported ;-)
I think we should
reassign 612516 linux-2.6
found 612516 2.6.32-29
retitle 612516 quiet option shouldn't hide unsupported video mode question
thanks
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 07:53, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote:
Excerpts from Christian PERRIER's message of Mit Feb 09 06:50:26 +0100 2011:
Another
801 - 900 of 4544 matches
Mail list logo
