On Wednesday 23 August 2006 07:24, Steve Langasek wrote:
So is updating linux-2.6 in testing *before* updating grub-installer
sufficient?
Yes, that is how I understand it from Otavio.
Therefore, no objections from d-i POV.
pgpC9P2qjtVG1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:40:59AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 07:24, Steve Langasek wrote:
So is updating linux-2.6 in testing *before* updating grub-installer
sufficient?
Yes, that is how I understand it from Otavio.
Therefore, no objections from d-i POV.
And
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:40:59AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 07:24, Steve Langasek wrote:
So is updating linux-2.6 in testing *before* updating grub-installer
sufficient?
Yes, that is how I understand it from Otavio.
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:58:20PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:12:43 -0700, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
- grub-installer would have a change to don't use full paths in
kernel-img.conf entries _but_ this one need
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:12:43 -0700, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
- grub-installer would have a change to don't use full paths in
kernel-img.conf entries _but_ this one need to migrate to etch
together with linux-2.6 2.6.17-6 OR new installations will be
broken.
Could you please
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:58:20PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:12:43 -0700, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
- grub-installer would have a change to don't use full paths in
kernel-img.conf entries _but_ this one need to migrate to etch
together with
Hi Otavio,
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 06:10:15PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
For this to happen, my transition plan is described bellow:
- A new grub package would be uploaded to unstable having a group of
wrappers that will call /usr/sbin utilities but warn the user to
edit his/her
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 06:10:15PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
I plan to upload a group of changes to grub and grub-installer to
move update-grub and grub-install to /usr/sbin/.
For this to happen, my transition plan is described bellow:
- A new grub package would be uploaded
Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RM team, is ok to me go forward with it?
I think the above misses the _why_
The announce only mentions the new, the proposed, location.
I'm happy with the removal of the full paths, but not happy with /usr/sbin
Please allow to grub install
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 08:07:45 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
You don't need grub-install to install grub
Not according to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=345931;msg=60. But I do
think that lib/grub, sbin/grub-install and so on should move to /usr, or
update-grub should be
Sam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You don't need grub-install to install grub
Not according to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=345931;msg=60. But I do
think that lib/grub, sbin/grub-install and so on should move to /usr, or
update-grub should be rewritten to function
Hello,
I plan to upload a group of changes to grub and grub-installer to
move update-grub and grub-install to /usr/sbin/.
For this to happen, my transition plan is described bellow:
- A new grub package would be uploaded to unstable having a group of
wrappers that will call /usr/sbin
12 matches
Mail list logo
