On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:22:23PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
This assertion is completely wrong. The kernel wasn't ready until last
upload so we were not blocking it since it wasn't _ready_ to migrate
to testing.
No. We seem to have different definitions of ready. The whole bunch of
linux
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 08:28:07PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
- linux-2.6 has been ready to migrate to testing for 3 months.
IIRC I check its excuses fairly regularly and until recently it's
had RC bugs keeping it out.
This does not match the bug list. There is 1 RC bug open which already
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 08:28:07PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
- linux-2.6 has been ready to migrate to testing for 3 months.
IIRC I check its excuses fairly regularly and until recently it's
had RC bugs
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:34:56PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 05:19:43PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
Hi Otavio,
Latest kernel-wedge has been uploaded today to sid and we should start
the updating the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:04:54PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I decided to go directly to 2.6.26 for s390 which is estimated for the
next days.
Please don't do
Bastian Blank wrote:
Nope. You blocked it already for 3 months.
This seems to imply that:
- linux-2.6 has been ready to migrate to testing for 3 months.
IIRC I check its excuses fairly regularly and until recently it's
had RC bugs keeping it out.
- d-i somehow blocked the kernel from
Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 05:19:43PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
Hi Otavio,
Latest kernel-wedge has been uploaded today to sid and we should start
the updating the installer to 2.6.25 kernel. I have uploaded the
packages for amd64 and
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 05:19:43PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I have uploaded the
packages for amd64 and i386 and would like to ask porters to handle it
for your pet architecture(s).
I decided to go directly to 2.6.26 for s390 which is estimated
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 05:19:43PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I have uploaded the
packages for amd64 and i386 and would like to ask porters to handle it
for your pet architecture(s).
I decided to go
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:04:54PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I decided to go directly to 2.6.26 for s390 which is estimated for the
next days.
Please don't do that. Please upload .25 kernel for s390 as we're doing
for all architectures so we can
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 05:29:44PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Nope. You blocked it already for 3 months. This have to stop.
I want a working proposal from the installer team how to avoid blocking
the kernel in unstable for more than one month. I made one which you did
not like so it is your
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 05:19:43PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
Hi Otavio,
Latest kernel-wedge has been uploaded today to sid and we should start
the updating the installer to 2.6.25 kernel. I have uploaded the
packages for amd64 and i386 and would like to ask porters to handle it
* Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-02 17:19]:
Latest kernel-wedge has been uploaded today to sid and we should start
the updating the installer to 2.6.25 kernel. I have uploaded the
packages for amd64 and i386 and would like to ask porters to handle it
for your pet architecture(s).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Latest kernel-wedge has been uploaded today to sid and we should start
the updating the installer to 2.6.25 kernel. I have uploaded the
packages for amd64 and i386 and would like to ask porters to handle it
for your pet architecture(s).
14 matches
Mail list logo
