* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-11 10:02]:
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
It might be nice to automate the not-yet-uploaded package
detection, and compile them all, and other thing...
find -type d -name debian | while read A; do
(
cd $(dirname $A);
debuild-pbuilder;
* Junichi Uekawa wrote:
| It might be nice to automate the not-yet-uploaded package
| detection, and compile them all, and other thing...
I'm not sure. I don't like «build all packages and upload» is a good
idea. However, if somebody extends uptodatecheck.sh with a --build I
wouldn't mindt.
* Jim Lynch
| Absolutely... I had to cd into each of several dirs containing source
| for udebs and run dpkg-buildpackage in each one. I'd like to see a
| situation under which I would type make -once-, and it builds all the
| udebs.
Why? (as in, I think that is a silly idea.)
| Yes, I
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit:
| Absolutely... I had to cd into each of several dirs containing source
| for udebs and run dpkg-buildpackage in each one. I'd like to see a
| situation under which I would type make -once-, and it builds all the
| udebs.
Why? (as in,
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
It might be nice to automate the not-yet-uploaded package
detection, and compile them all, and other thing...
find -type d -name debian | while read A; do
(
cd $(dirname $A);
debuild-pbuilder;
)
done
Note that build/Makefile already does
On 30 Aug 2002 17:05:52 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jim Lynch
| Over the past few days, I tried to build debian-installer, and
| subtracting some minor frustrations that could have been cleared up
| in the docs, it was pretty easy to build, if tedious: essentially, I
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 12:00:18AM -0700, Jim Lynch wrote:
On 30 Aug 2002 17:05:52 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jim Lynch
| Over the past few days, I tried to build debian-installer, and
| subtracting some minor frustrations that could have been cleared up
| in
* Jim Lynch
| Over the past few days, I tried to build debian-installer, and
| subtracting some minor frustrations that could have been cleared up
| in the docs, it was pretty easy to build, if tedious: essentially, I
| had to run a build process much more than once.
You shouldn't. Can you
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 21:09:22 -0400
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:42:30PM -0700, Jim Lynch wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:46:41 -0400
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am in complete agreement that we would not want to include EVMS, XFS
or
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:46:41 -0400
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 12:09:08AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
Matt Zimmerman wrote on Mon Jul 29, 2002 um 09:00:42AM:
What is the basis for your objection? Are you going to try to stop
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:42:30PM -0700, Jim Lynch wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:46:41 -0400
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am in complete agreement that we would not want to include EVMS, XFS
or similar in our default kernel unless (or until) they are part of the
official
#include hallo.h
Karl M. Hegbloom wrote on Sun Jul 28, 2002 um 11:01:42PM:
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...], we need some more partition tools; there has been some
discussion on debian-boot regarding it but no final decision has
been reached, though several solutions have
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 08:26:51AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
Karl M. Hegbloom wrote on Sun Jul 28, 2002 um 11:01:42PM:
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...], we need some more partition tools; there has been some
discussion on debian-boot regarding it but
#include hallo.h
Matt Zimmerman wrote on Mon Jul 29, 2002 um 09:00:42AM:
I object. EVMS is nice and it is the future. But currently, I miss some
features and the guys are preparing a new version with major changes.
Lvm10 is known to be stable enough, EVMS is not (yet).
What is the
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 12:09:08AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
Matt Zimmerman wrote on Mon Jul 29, 2002 um 09:00:42AM:
What is the basis for your objection? Are you going to try to stop someone
else from doing this development?
Pretty simple. The same reason as for
[Ob-CC: Cc'd just FYI. d-i refers to the next generation Debian
Installer, which you may view at http://cvs.debian.org/ and discuss in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; also archived there - http.]
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am in complete agreement that we would not want to include EVMS,
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...], we need some more partition tools; there has been some
discussion on debian-boot regarding it but no final decision has
been reached, though several solutions have been presented.
I wonder if the partition tools can do EVMS, or if a plugin
17 matches
Mail list logo
