On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 02:05 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
Hello,
2014-04-28 12:26 GMT+02:00 Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk:
On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 19:06 +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 08:42:23AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Aside: EfikaMX is listed in 2.1.2.4 as no
Hello,
2014-04-28 12:26 GMT+02:00 Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk:
On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 19:06 +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 08:42:23AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Aside: EfikaMX is listed in 2.1.2.4 as no longer supported, but we do
supply a specific image for it
On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 19:06 +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 08:42:23AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Aside: EfikaMX is listed in 2.1.2.4 as no longer supported, but we do
supply a specific image for it using the armmp kernel:
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 19:05 -0400, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Karsten Merker mer...@debian.org [2014-04-24 22:02]:
I have described this limitation in the installation-guide
(http://d-i.debian.org/manual/en.armhf/ch02s01.html, section
2.1.2.3. Platforms supported by Debian/armhf) and think
* Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com [2014-04-19 19:50]:
I'm a bit worried that this might imply a greater level of support for
any board with a DTB than we actually offer. Not really sure how to deal
with that, probably more of a docs issue than anything.
I have two concerns:
1) Like you,
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 13:58 -0400, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com [2014-04-19 19:50]:
I must have used the wrong email account earlier, switching to my home
address here...
I'm a bit worried that this might imply a greater level of support for
any board with
* Karsten Merker mer...@debian.org [2014-04-24 22:02]:
I have described this limitation in the installation-guide
(http://d-i.debian.org/manual/en.armhf/ch02s01.html, section
2.1.2.3. Platforms supported by Debian/armhf) and think the
advantages of providing all DTBs overall outweigh the
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 07:50:07PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Now that armhf only has a single kernel flavour I think we can simplify
the installer setup a bit.
Firstly by moving the armmp subarch to the top level and secondly by
dropping the version from the kernel filename. Leading to
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 12:32 +0200, K. Merker wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 07:50:07PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Now that armhf only has a single kernel flavour I think we can simplify
the installer setup a bit.
Firstly by moving the armmp subarch to the top level and secondly by
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 12:32 +0200, K. Merker wrote:
gitorious seems to have problems at the moment (trying to access
the web interface gives bad gateway, running git clone gives
timeouts).
It does seem to be down right now :-/.
Which means I can't push the bugfix I've just made, which is to
Hi,
Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com (2014-04-19):
Now that armhf only has a single kernel flavour I think we can simplify
the installer setup a bit.
Firstly by moving the armmp subarch to the top level and secondly by
dropping the version from the kernel filename. Leading to
Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk (2014-04-20):
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 12:32 +0200, K. Merker wrote:
gitorious seems to have problems at the moment (trying to access
the web interface gives bad gateway, running git clone gives
timeouts).
It does seem to be down right now :-/.
Which
On 20 April 2014 15:03, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 12:32 +0200, K. Merker wrote:
gitorious seems to have problems at the moment (trying to access
the web interface gives bad gateway, running git clone gives
timeouts).
It does seem to be down right now :-/.
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:13 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com (2014-04-19):
Now that armhf only has a single kernel flavour I think we can simplify
the installer setup a bit.
Firstly by moving the armmp subarch to the top level and secondly by
Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk (2014-04-20):
The kernel is in svn still, which is what I meant there.
Yeah, sorry, I didn't read carefully enough.
I plan to push:
armhf: move armmp subarch to the toplevel.
arm: include dtb files for netboot.
to d-i master shortly (once
Now that armhf only has a single kernel flavour I think we can simplify
the installer setup a bit.
Firstly by moving the armmp subarch to the top level and secondly by
dropping the version from the kernel filename. Leading to
installer-armhf/201403XX/images/netboot/initrd.gz
16 matches
Mail list logo
