Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-05-09 Thread Philipp Kern
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:53:05PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Whether this is the one labelled alpha 1 or not isn't exactly my call, but I guess it's mostly about PR et al., rather than about technical matters. As far as I'm concerned, a missing upload was what worried me most, especially

Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-05-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi again, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (07/05/2012): in case it helps, I've prepared a branch with some changes for d-i. Given what's in git looks suitable for everyone's needs (basically: getting it to build on kfreebsd-* again), it only contains minor stuff (namely: pleasing lintian).

Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-05-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 23:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 17:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 16:54 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: I can do an alpha build of CDs whenever they're desired, just let me know when things are looking ready. Ah,

Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-05-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 15:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: So, in the absence of any replies or better ideas on IRC, I've scheduled a binNMU for d-i on amd64. If that goes okay then I'll do the other architectures and we can look at where we go from there. Apparently I missed that one of the

Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-05-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (06/05/2012): Apparently I missed that one of the outstanding changes in git was quite important - the kfreebsd-* binNMUs failed due to the kernel version having changed from 8.2 to 8.3, which was covered by ae6982018059e936e1b0fe5e72a9f735fb8db92a

Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-05-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 17:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 16:54 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: I can do an alpha build of CDs whenever they're desired, just let me know when things are looking ready. Ah, I'd somewhat assumed that Otavio's Steve, yey! above meant that

Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-04-29 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 13:43 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: By the way, I have a question. What is the difference between the netboot and the xen image ? I thought I would need the xen image on the Amazon cloud, but it worked well with the simple netboot (which is good as the xen image did not

Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-04-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: To what we had for a1 basically: get CD images built (Steve, yey!); test them finish announce mail mail to to d-d-a if all above work How are things going with that? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-04-29 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 04:49:40PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: To what we had for a1 basically: get CD images built (Steve, yey!); test them finish announce mail mail to to d-d-a if all above work How are things going with that?

Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-04-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 16:54 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 04:49:40PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: To what we had for a1 basically: get CD images built (Steve, yey!); test them finish announce mail

Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-04-27 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 02:32:57PM -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit : I do need help to manage the missing steps and testing. Is someone willing to help on it? Dear Otavio, I am not sure how far this can help, but I tested today's daily build of netboot (amd64) on the Amazon cloud, and it

Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-04-24 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Miguel Figueiredo (el...@debianpt.org): Hi, On 23-04-2012 20:31, Otavio Salvador wrote: [...] To what we had for a1 basically: Major bummers from recent d-i installations: - it's not possible to install with raid+lvm because it fails while installing grub (see #662086). -

Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-04-24 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:26, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: Major bummers from recent d-i installations: - it's not possible to install with raid+lvm because it fails while installing grub (see #662086). - and kfreebsd daily builds (and installations) are failing; Are these

Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-04-23 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Hi, On 23-04-2012 18:32, Otavio Salvador wrote: [...] I do need help to manage the missing steps and testing. Is someone willing to help on it? Count with me for testing installation images. Can you elaborate remaining steps where we can help? I'm sad to ask for it but I won't be able to

Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-04-23 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 16:06, Miguel Figueiredo el...@debianpt.org wrote: I do need help to manage the missing steps and testing. Is someone willing to help on it? Count with me for testing installation images. Can you elaborate remaining steps where we can help? To what we had for a1

Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1

2012-04-23 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Hi, On 23-04-2012 20:31, Otavio Salvador wrote: [...] To what we had for a1 basically: Major bummers from recent d-i installations: - it's not possible to install with raid+lvm because it fails while installing grub (see #662086). - and kfreebsd daily builds (and installations) are