On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:48:46PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 11:09:20PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Interesting. Where did you get these images from? people.d.o/~jbailey?
Also I assume this is on sparc64, right?
^-- please answer, it's important :)
I got it from
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 07:28:16AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Does debian-installer require devfs=mount is a boot param still? We have
a fix to make the sparc/sparc64 kernel images default with this command
line for netbooting (IOW, when SILO is not used to load the kernel),
but if it isn't
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 04:17:24PM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 07:28:16AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Does debian-installer require devfs=mount is a boot param still? We have
a fix to make the sparc/sparc64 kernel images default with this command
line for
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 09:47:28AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 04:17:24PM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 07:28:16AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Does debian-installer require devfs=mount is a boot param still? We have
a fix to make the
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:21:32PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
debian-installer completely relies on devfs at the moment,
unconditionally. For instance, many components walk /dev/discs.
Unconditionally, unless you're using userdevfs. So far userdevfs has
only been used with 2.2 kernels, but it
5 matches
Mail list logo
