On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 07:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 15:36 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
Agreed; and I think I was unclear. I was taking for granted that we
*will* do a 46squeeze2 now w/ the CVE-2013-0871 fix and bypass
46squeeze1. 46squeeze2 would provide the
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 15:36 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
Agreed; and I think I was unclear. I was taking for granted that we
*will* do a 46squeeze2 now w/ the CVE-2013-0871 fix and bypass
46squeeze1. 46squeeze2 would provide the security-only option.
The question was whether or not we should
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 01:41 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:28 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
Security update has been uploaded. I'll post the builds somewhere as
they become available for anyone interested in
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 01:41 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:28 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
Security update has been uploaded. I'll post the
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:33 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I gather there's a chance there might need to be further security
updates; will that mean we need another update in p-u?
Possibly; an alternative would be to release a
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:33 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 01:41 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:28 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:12:18PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:33 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 01:41 +, Ben
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 22:42 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:33 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I gather there's a chance there might need to be further security
updates; will that mean we need another
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 01:41 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:28 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
Security update has been uploaded. I'll post the builds somewhere as
they become available for anyone interested in testing.
Version 2.6.32-48 has also been uploaded.
Flagged for
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 03:34:51PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 15:18 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 12.02.2013 02:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
One or other of us will then need to merge the squeeze-security
branch
into squeeze and upload -48 in time for the point
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:28 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 03:34:51PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 15:18 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 12.02.2013 02:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
One or other of us will then need to merge the squeeze-security
On 12.02.2013 02:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
One or other of us will then need to merge the squeeze-security
branch
into squeeze and upload -48 in time for the point release.
Is there an ETA for that? Sorry for chasing, but if we're going to go
for the 23rd (which is looking likely atm) we'd be
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 15:18 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 12.02.2013 02:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
One or other of us will then need to merge the squeeze-security
branch
into squeeze and upload -48 in time for the point release.
Is there an ETA for that? Sorry for chasing, but if we're
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 03:34:51PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 15:18 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 12.02.2013 02:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
One or other of us will then need to merge the squeeze-security
branch
into squeeze and upload -48 in time for the point
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:41:03AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 16:25 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
We're somewhat overdue with the next Squeeze point release (6.0.7) and
it'd be good to get it done before the wheezy release, so that we can
pull in some upgrade
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 08:36 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:41:03AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 16:25 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
We're somewhat overdue with the next Squeeze point release (6.0.7) and
it'd be good to get it done
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 04:25:38PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
We're somewhat overdue with the next Squeeze point release (6.0.7) and
it'd be good to get it done before the wheezy release, so that we can
pull in some upgrade fixes. As an opening gambit, some proposed dates,
all
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 04:25:38PM +, Adam Barratt wrote:
Hi,
We're somewhat overdue with the next Squeeze point release (6.0.7) and
it'd be good to get it done before the wheezy release, so that we can
pull in some upgrade fixes. As an opening gambit, some proposed dates,
all of which appear
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 16:25 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
We're somewhat overdue with the next Squeeze point release (6.0.7) and
it'd be good to get it done before the wheezy release, so that we can
pull in some upgrade fixes. As an opening gambit, some proposed dates,
all of which
19 matches
Mail list logo
