Sorry for not really responding to this earlier. I've been somewhat
distracted by the GR nonsense going on...
I saw the conversation with Joey on IRC yesterday, and I think my comments
below are in line with that.
On Sunday 24 September 2006 19:04, Max Vozeler wrote:
Some possible approaches
Hi all,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:40:55PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
In the in between time (for arches that have already switched
to the new kernel), part of the functionality of the installer
will be unavailable. Seems acceptable though.
I think so too. I'll need to check that e.g.
On Thursday 28 September 2006 21:19, Max Vozeler wrote:
So, based on (I think) all feedback received, I created a first
package of this kind in /people/xam/kernel/; It includes only
loop-aes-modules for now but can be extended to also handle other
modules in a simple way once the need arises.
Max Vozeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Approach 1: Building module udebs in linux-kernel-di-*
...
About the delay: It could be reduced by including all modules
in linux-modules-extra-2.6, which is automatically updated
whenever a new kernel version/ABI gets uploaded.
Why not just add
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 03:28:52PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 25 September 2006 14:55, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Why not just add support to mark a module supporting d-i udebs and
teach linux-modules-extra-2.6 to build them. That would allow us to
have just one point to
On Monday 25 September 2006 14:55, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Why not just add support to mark a module supporting d-i udebs and
teach linux-modules-extra-2.6 to build them. That would allow us to
have just one point to change/improve/fix for them.
No. That solution has severe D-I release
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 25 September 2006 14:55, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Why not just add support to mark a module supporting d-i udebs and
teach linux-modules-extra-2.6 to build them. That would allow us to
have just one point to change/improve/fix for them.
No. That
On Monday 25 September 2006 18:30, Otavio Salvador wrote:
It'll be separately. linux-modules-extra uses package-source package
to build the binary and when doing it, we would build the need udeb
together.
No. You _cannot_ build udebs from the same source package as regular
binaries.
That is
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 25 September 2006 18:30, Otavio Salvador wrote:
It'll be separately. linux-modules-extra uses package-source package
to build the binary and when doing it, we would build the need udeb
together.
No. You _cannot_ build udebs from the same source
9 matches
Mail list logo
