Re: release-notes: please document unattended-upgrades

Hi On 23-03-2019 12:47, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > This was backed out at the request of the security team: > > https://tracker.debian.org/news/974578/accepted-pkgsel-057-source-into-unstable/ > > so I guess this makes this bug report moot? So let's close the bug. Paul signature.asc Descrip

Re: release-notes: please document unattended-upgrades

Hi, Paul Gevers (2019-03-23): > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi all, > > On Wed, 06 Dec 2017 19:39:08 +0100 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > [Please keep debian-boot@ and hert...@debian.org in copy of your answers.] > > done. > > > Raphaël Hertzog enabled unattended-upgrades support by default in

Re: release-notes: please document unattended-upgrades

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi all, On Wed, 06 Dec 2017 19:39:08 +0100 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > [Please keep debian-boot@ and hert...@debian.org in copy of your answers.] done. > Raphaël Hertzog enabled unattended-upgrades support by default in pkgsel, > which is first shipped with the D-I Buste

Re: Release notes: section about Braille displays in installing.dbk/installing.po

Quoting Samuel Thibault (samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org): > Hello, > > Christian Perrier, le Wed 04 Feb 2009 06:56:56 +0100, a écrit : > > After yesterday's rush to restore material related to Braille displays > > in installing.dbk of the release notes (see bug #514009), > > Uh... I didn't know th

Re: Release notes: section about Braille displays in installing.dbk/installing.po

Hello, Christian Perrier, le Wed 04 Feb 2009 06:56:56 +0100, a écrit : > After yesterday's rush to restore material related to Braille displays > in installing.dbk of the release notes (see bug #514009), Uh... I didn't know there was such documentation there. I had actually called for volunteer

Re: release-notes: s/w3c/w3m/g in "7.3. Log In"

On Sunday 30 November 2008, Noritada Kobayashi wrote: > Hi Osamu, > > This is not about the release notes, but about the installation guide. > So, I forward this message to debian-boot. > > 2008/11/24 Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > There is no w3c text browser. It should be w3m. > > > > Pleas

Re: release-notes: s/w3c/w3m/g in "7.3. Log In"

Hi Osamu, This is not about the release notes, but about the installation guide. So, I forward this message to debian-boot. 2008/11/24 Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > There is no w3c text browser. It should be w3m. > > Please: s/w3c/w3m/g > > --- > One easy way to view these document

Re: Release notes: Whats new in the installer?

On Sunday 29 October 2006 22:31, Geert Stappers wrote: > I'm taking this oppertunity to remind the identifiable DHCP request. > > Debian-Installer sents a DHCP with the vendor-option-string "d-i". > Which makes it possible for DHCP server to provide a DHCP reply > that includes the URL to a p

Re: Release notes: Whats new in the installer?

Op 28-10-2006 om 17:16 schreef Frans Pop: > On Saturday 28 October 2006 16:28, Rob Bradford wrote: > > [ offering help ] > > I'll take care of that myself. I'm taking this oppertunity to remind the identifiable DHCP request. Debian-Installer sents a DHCP with the vendor-option-string "d-i".

Re: Release notes: Whats new in the installer?

On Saturday 28 October 2006 16:28, Rob Bradford wrote: > For the release notes I need to write some text on whats new in the > installer as compared to sarge. As well as any key changes that might > catch an established user out. (Other things can go in the install > manual.) I'll take care of tha

Re: Release Notes available for translation

On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:29:09PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:05:14PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > (CC'ing d-boot; however, I propose to keep the discussion on d-doc.) > > > > IMHO a call for translation of the

Re: Release Notes available for translation

> Anyway, I've got the correct version now and will happily start translating. Could you post a note in -i18n also about this RN translation ? I don't follow -doc, so I'm not sure about the place this document is (in the Web site CVS or elsechere) but anyway, having this translation be a priori

Re: Release Notes available for translation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 16 September 2004 23:29, Rob Bradford wrote: > Some how you're not looking at the sarge branch there. I followed your > link, and that looked fine but you musnt choose to download HEAD. As > that currently has the woody version. Hello Rob,

Re: Release Notes available for translation

On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:05:14PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > (CC'ing d-boot; however, I propose to keep the discussion on d-doc.) > > IMHO a call for translation of the Release Notes is a bit premature. > > I have just downloaded the latest Eng

Re: Release Notes available for translation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 (CC'ing d-boot; however, I propose to keep the discussion on d-doc.) IMHO a call for translation of the Release Notes is a bit premature. I have just downloaded the latest English version from [1] with the intention of starting a Dutch translation.

Re: release notes moved from debian-boot to debian-doc cvs repo

Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've now moved the release notes as well. > > Adam, please tag stuff appropriately, or whatever you did the last time :) Done. Btw, the tag is manual_now_in_DDP. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Release-notes in boot-floppies (was: adam di carlo is back)

On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 10:11:12PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: [...] > As said, #148054. Release-notes are not build in the install-doc > package. It is #148509 > IMHO we should fix the boot-floppies documentation build system > to provide an own copy of Release-Notes, but if you have a better ide

Re: Release notes suggestion

Chris Lawrence wrote: > [Cc'd to joeyh and taggart for any comments they might want to add.] > > For section 1.2: (in bastard child of text and HTML) > > Debian GNU/Linux now includes preliminary support for the Linux > Standard Base 1.1.0 (http://www.linuxbase.org/), which is designed to > imp

Re: Release-notes

The italian translation of the release notes are being worked and we plan to put the documentation in the CVS in some weeks. Bye, Giuseppe Il Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:03:33PM -0700, Chris Tillman ha scritto: [...] > Well, yes and no. On debian-www robster got a little overwhelmed with > the job a

Re: Release-notes

On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:00:10PM +0100, Claus Hindsgaul wrote: > Chris Tilman wrote > >So I think the current cvs version is actually pretty up-to-date. It > >still needs the list of renamed and split packages, and anything else > >needed along those lines, and some better review for potential g

Re: Release-notes

Chris Tilman wrote >So I think the current cvs version is actually pretty up-to-date. It >still needs the list of renamed and split packages, and anything else >needed along those lines, and some better review for potential gotchas >people should know about. But it's in fairly good shape otherwise

Re: Release-notes

On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:03:33PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:25:43AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > What is the status of the release-notes for Woody? When will be a good time > > > to initiate translation? > >

Re: Release-notes udma100-ext3

#include Claus Hindsgaul wrote on Sun Dec 09, 2001 um 02:55:19PM: > Very similar to 'vanilla', except it includes support for the Promise and > Highpoint EIDE chipsets used e.g. on modern boards with VIA chipsets ... and some new ethernet cards not supported by default in kernel 2.2.20 and loa

Re: Release-notes

On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:25:43AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What is the status of the release-notes for Woody? When will be a good time > > to initiate translation? > > They are apparently being worked on somewhere else. We should remove >

Re: Release-notes udma100-ext3

Søndag den 9. december 2001 13:59 skrev Philip Blundell: > Neither. The current flavours are vanilla, idepci, compact, reiserfs and > udma100-ext3. This should be corrected. The existing description of 'ide'/'udma66' is: `udma66' Very similar to `vanilla', except it includes Andre Hedr

Re: Release-notes

In message , Claus Hindsgaul writes: >release-notes: > vanilla, idepci, compact, ide > >hardware.sgml/inst-methods.sgml: > vanilla, idepci, compact, udma66 > >Which is the correct one? Neither. The current flavours are vanilla, idepci, compact, reiserfs and udma100-ex

Re: [redferni@logica.com: Re: Release Notes!!!]

Josip Rodin wrote: > (Updates to release notes will be allowed in the next point release, I hope) That reminds me of the requirement of a general '2.2 Release Remarks' maintained on the web, concerning *all* packages' problems, like this one (at least until it's written down in the official relea

Re: [redferni@logica.com: Re: Release Notes!!!]

On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 10:49:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > From: Ian Redfern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Release Notes!!! > > One thing that I don't remember seeing in the release notes is a mention > that

Re: Release Notes (Re: Stuff to do before release)

"J.A. Bezemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've spent the last ~2 days getting home from my relatively-well-net-connected > vacation spot. I didn't have time to examine postings to -doc/-testing and > merge them in the release notes (until now I supposed Josip would've been > doing that) and I

Re: Release Notes!!!

On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 09:46:12PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > I'm not sure what good it'll do, but this is the absolute >>last chance<< > for changes to the release notes before release. Josip, who took wonderful > care of this for TC3, is on holidays so isn't available to do this. > It wou

[redferni@logica.com: Re: Release Notes!!!]

EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Release Notes!!! One thing that I don't remember seeing in the release notes is a mention that, after upgrading from slink, it is necessary to install a 2.2.x kernel before Samba will work again. This is a known bug (#60580) but could easily cause confusion - peopl

Re: Release notes

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 02:15:52PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > I would suggest the following changes to Release notes: > > - converting the paragraph about problems with 2.2 kernels to an itemized >list, as this would probably make the each problem more visible I agree, it'll be done. >