On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 02:32:44PM -0600, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 02:55:39PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Well actually I meant chroot /target or chroot target gives me the
error:
chroot: USER=root: No such file or directory
I tried using the chroot that was
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:00:35PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 08:41:09PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:31:03PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
It appears that sed.c was in an indeterminate state when the
sed fix backport occurred. The appended
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 02:55:39PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Well actually I meant chroot /target or chroot target gives me the
error:
chroot: USER=root: No such file or directory
I tried using the chroot that was installed with base and it worked
fine. :-(
It looks to me like
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:51:45PM -0600, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:35:20PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
On Mon May 14, 2001 at 05:00:34PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
Currently using a 0.50 build with the md5sum fix in it, but in that
sed doesn't work,
sed -n
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:47:06AM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:51:45PM -0600, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:35:20PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
On Mon May 14, 2001 at 05:00:34PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
Currently using a 0.50 build with the
On Thu May 17, 2001 at 12:47:06AM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
Now using 0.51-4 source, on hppa, and sed still appears to be
broken. Now it isn't appending '\n' to its output lines, so all
output appears as one continuous line:
Test file:
=== cut
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:31:03PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:47:06AM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:51:45PM -0600, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:35:20PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
On Mon May 14, 2001 at 05:00:34PM +0100,
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 08:41:09PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:31:03PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
It appears that sed.c was in an indeterminate state when the
sed fix backport occurred. The appended patch backports some
more fixes and takes care of this
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 05:00:34PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 11:18:06AM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
I'm building a new one now. Rather then waiting for 0.52 to
stabalize, I'm backporting the critical bugfixes into 0.51.
Is that 0.51-3? You havn't picked up the
On Mon May 14, 2001 at 05:00:34PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
I built my own from 0.51-1 source last week and found zcat didn't
work if you fed it input in stdin - just gave a usage msg. Havn't
checked if that is fixed in cvs yet, or if it was a local problem.
That is fixed in 0.51-3.
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:35:20PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
On Mon May 14, 2001 at 05:00:34PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
Currently using a 0.50 build with the md5sum fix in it, but in that
sed doesn't work,
sed -n '/^[Mm][Dd]5[Ss][Uu][Mm]/,/^[^ ]/p' $reldest
only spits out the
At 12:46 PM -0700 5/11/01, David Whedon wrote:
Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:56:34PM -0500 wrote:
The next major stumbling block I ran into was that pump doesn't work
(bts# 94176). Pump has annoyed me for a number of reasons including
bts#64092 and its kin. I think there was some discussion
Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 12:46 PM -0700 5/11/01, David Whedon wrote:
Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:56:34PM -0500 wrote:
The next major stumbling block I ran into was that pump doesn't work
(bts# 94176). Pump has annoyed me for a number of reasons including
bts#64092
David Whedon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:56:34PM -0500 wrote:
That got me all the way to installing base, but that slammed to a halt
quickly since it appears that md5sum is broken (another busybox problem?
ppc-only? needs more research). So, I commented out the md5
Sounds like a good plan. /sbin/dhclient in the deb is a script that
calls either dhclient-2.2.x or dhclient-2.0.x depending on uname -r. I
just dropped dhclient-2.0.x and dhclient from the EXTRACT lists. I
wonder if dhclient-2.2.x is renamed dhclient in the udeb? I suppose
I'll just
On Sat May 12, 2001 at 01:05:55PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
David Whedon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:56:34PM -0500 wrote:
That got me all the way to installing base, but that slammed to a halt
quickly since it appears that md5sum is broken (another busybox
Erik Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm building a new one now. Rather then waiting for 0.52 to
stabalize, I'm backporting the critical bugfixes into 0.51.
Thank you . Please let us know when it's up. I can do a source
release tomorrow and then we can have working boot-floppies source
On Sat May 12, 2001 at 12:10:26PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
It is now in incoming. Lemme know if you have any problems with
it. I did a rather quick hack-n-slash job to put this together.
It should be fine now, and I think I have all bugs bothering the
boot-floppies fixed. Hopefully I
Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:56:34PM -0500 wrote:
On ppc I can now get all the way to extracting base.
glad to head it :-)
Sorry about
breaking Sparc -- I thought I recalled seeing __KERNEL__ in at least
asm-i386/unaligned.h, but it must have been my fuzzy eyes.
no biggie.
I have a couple
19 matches
Mail list logo
