Re: Remove of lilo-installer

2020-04-02 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi Thorsten! > > On 4/2/20 10:30 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit: > > > >> No idea what the stance on i386 is. But I think Thorsten is a LILO user. > > > > No, I haven’t been using LILO for a long time either. > > Okay,

Re: Remove of lilo-installer

2020-04-02 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Thorsten! On 4/2/20 10:30 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit: > >> No idea what the stance on i386 is. But I think Thorsten is a LILO user. > > No, I haven’t been using LILO for a long time either. Okay, bad memory on my side then :). > I _did_ use it about a

Re: Remove of lilo-installer

2020-04-02 Thread Thorsten Glaser
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit: >No idea what the stance on i386 is. But I think Thorsten is a LILO user. No, I haven’t been using LILO for a long time either. I _did_ use it about a decade ago, when I got back to Debian after using only BSD for a while, but even before that, I used loadlin

Re: Remove of lilo-installer

2020-04-01 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 09:09:25PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: >Hi, > >John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> On 4/1/20 10:36 AM, Holger Wansing wrote: >> > Am Mittwoch, 1. April 2020 schrieb Steve McIntyre: >> >> Hmmm, OK. We should also file an RM bug *too*, I guess. Which image >> >> are you

Re: Remove of lilo-installer

2020-04-01 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
entional then, or should an exclude be added for i386 too? I thought you were going to remove lilo-installer anyway? From the link I posted, it's obviously intentional for amd64. No idea what the stance on i386 is. But I think Thorsten is a LILO user. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

Re: Remove of lilo-installer

2020-04-01 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 4/1/20 10:36 AM, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 1. April 2020 schrieb Steve McIntyre: > >> Hmmm, OK. We should also file an RM bug *too*, I guess. Which image > >> are you looking at to see lilo-installer in the menu? > > > > Hmm, interesting

Re: Remove of lilo-installer

2020-04-01 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 4/1/20 10:36 AM, Holger Wansing wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 1. April 2020 schrieb Steve McIntyre: >> Hmmm, OK. We should also file an RM bug *too*, I guess. Which image >> are you looking at to see lilo-installer in the menu? > > Hmm, interesting detail: > alpha1 or 2 netinst image for i386. >

Re: Remove of lilo-installer

2020-04-01 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Am Mittwoch, 1. April 2020 schrieb Steve McIntyre: > Hmmm, OK. We should also file an RM bug *too*, I guess. Which image > are you looking at to see lilo-installer in the menu? Hmm, interesting detail: alpha1 or 2 netinst image for i386. amd64 however is not affected. Holger -- Sent

Re: Remove of lilo-installer

2020-03-31 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hey Holger, On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:35PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: >Hi Steve and Cyril, > >with commit >https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i/-/commit/1b38286273225ac0cfbdd4b3572031a2eb2e8633 >lilo-installer has been removed from d-i/scripts/buildscript. > >However, the latest

Remove of lilo-installer

2020-03-31 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi Steve and Cyril, with commit https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i/-/commit/1b38286273225ac0cfbdd4b3572031a2eb2e8633 lilo-installer has been removed from d-i/scripts/buildscript. However, the latest alpha2 still contains it, or at least the menu entry for lilo-installer