Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Thorsten!
>
> On 4/2/20 10:30 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
> >
> >> No idea what the stance on i386 is. But I think Thorsten is a LILO user.
> >
> > No, I haven’t been using LILO for a long time either.
>
> Okay,
Hi Thorsten!
On 4/2/20 10:30 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
>
>> No idea what the stance on i386 is. But I think Thorsten is a LILO user.
>
> No, I haven’t been using LILO for a long time either.
Okay, bad memory on my side then :).
> I _did_ use it about a
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
>No idea what the stance on i386 is. But I think Thorsten is a LILO user.
No, I haven’t been using LILO for a long time either.
I _did_ use it about a decade ago, when I got back to Debian
after using only BSD for a while, but even before that, I
used loadlin
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 09:09:25PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
>Hi,
>
>John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> On 4/1/20 10:36 AM, Holger Wansing wrote:
>> > Am Mittwoch, 1. April 2020 schrieb Steve McIntyre:
>> >> Hmmm, OK. We should also file an RM bug *too*, I guess. Which image
>> >> are you
entional then, or should an exclude be added for i386 too?
I thought you were going to remove lilo-installer anyway? From the link
I posted, it's obviously intentional for amd64.
No idea what the stance on i386 is. But I think Thorsten is a LILO user.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 4/1/20 10:36 AM, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 1. April 2020 schrieb Steve McIntyre:
> >> Hmmm, OK. We should also file an RM bug *too*, I guess. Which image
> >> are you looking at to see lilo-installer in the menu?
> >
> > Hmm, interesting
On 4/1/20 10:36 AM, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 1. April 2020 schrieb Steve McIntyre:
>> Hmmm, OK. We should also file an RM bug *too*, I guess. Which image
>> are you looking at to see lilo-installer in the menu?
>
> Hmm, interesting detail:
> alpha1 or 2 netinst image for i386.
>
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 1. April 2020 schrieb Steve McIntyre:
> Hmmm, OK. We should also file an RM bug *too*, I guess. Which image
> are you looking at to see lilo-installer in the menu?
Hmm, interesting detail:
alpha1 or 2 netinst image for i386.
amd64 however is not affected.
Holger
--
Sent
Hey Holger,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:35PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
>Hi Steve and Cyril,
>
>with commit
>https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i/-/commit/1b38286273225ac0cfbdd4b3572031a2eb2e8633
>lilo-installer has been removed from d-i/scripts/buildscript.
>
>However, the latest
Hi Steve and Cyril,
with commit
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i/-/commit/1b38286273225ac0cfbdd4b3572031a2eb2e8633
lilo-installer has been removed from d-i/scripts/buildscript.
However, the latest alpha2 still contains it, or at least the menu entry for
lilo-installer
10 matches
Mail list logo