Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
Second proposal (to be sent this evening if I have enough time for
that). Thanks to Holger for the improvement suggestions.
The Debian Installer team is proud for the release of the final version
of D-I, thus allowing lenny to be released later on.
Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org writes:
[...]
From the poll results, one time slot is very appropriate: Monday March
16th 21:00UTC. However, the only non available person at that moment
is Otaviowhich is infortunate. Also, the slot was marked yellow by
Colin Watson and Steve
As Otavio freed out some time for March 16th, that date becomes the
best suited moment to organize the meeting.
I did setup a (short) agenda on
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings/Coordination
I'm not sure whether it's worth adding items to this
agenda. Currently, I'm thinking that
Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org writes:
[...]
Unless there are objections, I plan to announce that meeting a little
bit widely, maybe on d-d-a.In such case, it would be good to draft
some announcement.
Please do.
Proposal:
After the release of lenny where the installer turned
The poll closed on Thursday March 5th.
https://doodle.com/participation.html?pollId=c3ewpvevhkqs7rxe
From the poll results, one time slot is very appropriate: Monday March
16th 21:00UTC. However, the only non available person at that moment
is Otaviowhich is infortunate. Also, the slot was
((volunterily breaking out threading)
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
I will choose the best suited time from the poll results. Of course, I
will try to arrange time for the key people (mostly those who followed
up on my initial mail...plus Steve Mc Intyre, who I'd like to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier wrote:
Now that the lenny release is over, I think it's time for all of us to
gather and discuss what the D-I team currently is and what should be
done for the lenny-squeeze release cycle (not technically speaking
but first more
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 06:43:03AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Stephen R Marenka (step...@marenka.net):
FWIW: m68k still builds too [1].
[1] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/images/daily/
Hmmm, I can't check right now (offline) but I don't remember seeing
Hello,
Christian Perrier, le Thu 26 Feb 2009 21:49:58 +0100, a écrit :
If we organize something called a team meeting to talk about this,
who would attend?
I would, for the a11y part.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Monday 02 March 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Stephen R Marenka (step...@marenka.net):
FWIW: m68k still builds too [1].
[1] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/images/daily/
Hmmm, I can't check right now (offline) but I don't remember seeing
mention of m68k builds on
* Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org) wrote:
Now that the lenny release is over, I think it's time for all of us to
gather and discuss what the D-I team currently is and what should be
done for the lenny-squeeze release cycle (not technically speaking
but first more on organisational
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
If we organize something called a team meeting to talk about this,
who would attend?
OK, thanks to everybody who replied. Apparently, there are enough
people around for a meeting to be relevant.
So, I'll try organizing the meeting.
Sorry for
On Thursday 26 February 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Now that the lenny release is over, I think it's time for all of us to
gather and discuss what the D-I team currently is and what should be
done for the lenny-squeeze release cycle (not technically speaking
but first more on organisational
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 09:37 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:49:58PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Now that the lenny release is over, I think it's time for all of us
to gather and discuss what the D-I team currently is and what should
be done for
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
I know that the Debconf team used some web-based thing to poll for
setting meeting times. Please feel free to setup such thing if you
know how to do it and feelthis is needed.
The thing is doodle.ch.
I have setup a poll in order to try getting
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
I know that the Debconf team used some web-based thing to poll for
setting meeting times. Please feel free to setup such thing if you
know how to do it and feelthis is needed.
The thing is doodle.ch.
I have setup
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
We need the poll URL for that as one can't search for it...
Sigh I was taking care to write the mail and forgot the URL..:-)
http://doodle.com/c3ewpvevhkqs7rxe
Thanks for the heads up, Luk.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 12:53:03PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
is worrysome. You only have to look at the daily build page [2] to see
that. We currently only have 4 arches building reliably (i386, armel,
sparc and s390). The rest have been absent or failing for some weeks or
months. The only
Quoting Stephen R Marenka (step...@marenka.net):
FWIW: m68k still builds too [1].
[1] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/images/daily/
Hmmm, I can't check right now (offline) but I don't remember seeing
mention of m68k builds on the general build status page.
signature.asc
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:49:58PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Now that the lenny release is over, I think it's time for all of us to
gather and discuss what the D-I team currently is and what should be
done for the lenny-squeeze release cycle (not technically speaking
but first more on
Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:49:58PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Now that the lenny release is over, I think it's time for all of us to
gather and discuss what the D-I team currently is and what should be
done for the lenny-squeeze release cycle (not technically speaking
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:49:58PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Now that the lenny release is over, I think it's time for all of us to
gather and discuss what the D-I team currently is and what should be
done for the lenny-squeeze release cycle (not technically speaking
but first more on
Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org writes:
Now that the lenny release is over, I think it's time for all of us to
gather and discuss what the D-I team currently is and what should be
done for the lenny-squeeze release cycle (not technically speaking
but first more on organisational issues).
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:49:58PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Now that the lenny release is over, I think it's time for all of us to
gather and discuss what the D-I team currently is and what should be
done for the lenny-squeeze release cycle (not technically speaking
but first more on
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:49:58PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Now that the lenny release is over, I think it's time for all of us to
gather and discuss what the D-I team currently is and what should be
done for the lenny-squeeze release cycle (not technically speaking
but first more on
Now that the lenny release is over, I think it's time for all of us to
gather and discuss what the D-I team currently is and what should be
done for the lenny-squeeze release cycle (not technically speaking
but first more on organisational issues).
If we organize something called a team meeting
26 matches
Mail list logo
