Re: Unblock of packages in could be handled by britney

2008-04-07 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 01:46:54PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: Status is: I personally think we'll need to address this at some point but it has never really been discussed within the team and I've no idea what will be involved other than that it's likely to be invasive. In other words: there is

Re: Unblock of packages in could be handled by britney

2008-04-05 Thread Luk Claes
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 07:25:15AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: On Friday 04 April 2008, Frans Pop wrote: Note that this still only one reason why we need the acks. Preventing breakage is the other. Actually, the current klibc migration is a very nice example of this, so let me elaborate. I

Re: Unblock of packages in could be handled by britney

2008-04-05 Thread Frans Pop
(No need to CC me: I read both lists) On Saturday 05 April 2008, Luk Claes wrote: If proper britney support was implemented there _are_ some udebs that could be done completely automatically, but there will always be cases where automated checks are insufficient. At least until we

Re: Unblock of packages in could be handled by britney

2008-04-04 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Philipp Kern wrote: On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:42:31PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: It started with a request from maks to unblock mklibs which phil acted on without waiting for an OK from a D-I RM. klibc, not mklibs. Yes, sorry. Let me also note that my intention or

Re: Unblock of packages in could be handled by britney

2008-04-04 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 09:22:32AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: Fact of life is that ATM udebs need to be synced manually after a package migrates and that the D-I RM is the person who coordinates that, so even if a package is safe to migrate, he needs to know about it and the best way to

Re: Unblock of packages in could be handled by britney

2008-04-04 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 04 April 2008, Philipp Kern wrote: On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 09:22:32AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: Fact of life is that ATM udebs need to be synced manually after a package migrates and that the D-I RM is the person who coordinates that, so even if a package is safe to migrate, he

Re: Unblock of packages in could be handled by britney

2008-04-04 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 04 April 2008, Frans Pop wrote: Note that this still only one reason why we need the acks. Preventing breakage is the other. Actually, the current klibc migration is a very nice example of this, so let me elaborate. Yesterday we had the following message and commit:

Unblock of packages in could be handled by britney

2008-04-03 Thread Philipp Kern
[ Ob: Please keep this discussion on at least d-release ] Hi there, today members of the Release Team wondered on IRC about when to unblock udebs in the could be handled by britney section of the freeze hints file while not being in any d-i beta freezes. Otavio suggested that they could be

Re: Unblock of packages in could be handled by britney

2008-04-03 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Philipp Kern wrote: today members of the Release Team wondered on IRC about when to unblock udebs in the could be handled by britney section of the freeze hints file while not being in any d-i beta freezes. For those who did not see the discussion on IRC, here's the

Re: Unblock of packages in could be handled by britney

2008-04-03 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:42:31PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: It started with a request from maks to unblock mklibs which phil acted on without waiting for an OK from a D-I RM. klibc, not mklibs. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer :