On Thursday 21 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> And just in case, with a daily-built Debian image, the list of libs
> without any packages depending on them (packages from a minimal Debian
> install) is:
For daily built images at the current stage of the release cycle this
really isn't ve
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 16:46:07 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> No. The priority of the libraries is correct, at least correct according
> to the ongoing policy "no package should depend on a package of lower
> priority". That's why those libraries are in important/standard, because
> some package
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> + Frans Pop (Wed, 20 May 2009 20:00:39 +0200):
> > On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> > > Still using the minimal install example (without selection
> > > "standard system" nor other task), shouldn't them have their
> > > priorit
Hi!
On Thu, 21 May 2009 16:46:07 +0200
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> + Frans Pop (Wed, 20 May 2009 20:00:39 +0200):
>
> > On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> > > Still using the minimal install example (without selection
> > > "standard system" nor other task), shouldn't them have
+ Frans Pop (Wed, 20 May 2009 20:00:39 +0200):
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> > Still using the minimal install example (without selection "standard
> > system" nor other task), shouldn't them have their priority lowered
> > then?
> Possibly. But that is something that
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Still using the minimal install example (without selection "standard
> system" nor other task), shouldn't them have their priority lowered
> then?
Possibly. But that is something that probably should have been done
*before* lenny was releas
Hi Frans!
On Wed, 20 May 2009 17:31:04 +0200
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > Frans Pop schrieb:
> > >> Sorry if this "issue" was already discussed and if this is not a
> > >> problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
> > >> min
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Frans Pop schrieb:
> >> Sorry if this "issue" was already discussed and if this is not a
> >> problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
> >> minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I
> >> see t
Hi!
Frans Pop schrieb:
>> Sorry if this "issue" was already discussed and if this is not a
>> problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
>> minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I see
>> that some packages are installed but don't see to be needed.
>>
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Sorry if this "issue" was already discussed and if this is not a
> problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
> minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I see
> that some packages are installed but d
(CC me on replies, please)
Hi!
Sorry if this "issue" was already discussed and if this is not a
problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I see
that some packages are installed but don't see to be needed.
For exa
11 matches
Mail list logo
