Re: Bug# 983357: Why is it not mentioned in bullseye release notes / installation guide?

On 2/10/22 3:27 AM, Paul Gevers wrote: On 10-02-2022 01:34, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: Do I need to file another bug in addition to #983357 to get this problem listed on the bullseye (and also RC versions) d-i errata pages? This is the most establish process, so yes, I suggest you just go

Re: Bug# 983357: Why is it not mentioned in bullseye release notes / installation guide?

not understand why #983357 is not included on the d-i bullseye errata page. Please assume good faith. I would go for the most obvious possibility, that while being aware of this issue, they just didn't think at the same time of the installation guide. Sorry Debian Installer Team - if I said anything

Re: Bug# 983357: Why is it not mentioned in bullseye release notes / installation guide?

Hi Chuck, On 10-02-2022 01:34, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: The problem as I see it is that the debian installer team is already aware of the problem and has been aware of it for over six months because #983357 is marked as affecting d-i. So I do not understand why #983357 is not included on the d

Re: Bug# 983357: Why is it not mentioned in bullseye release notes / installation guide?

On 2/9/2022 3:43 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, Subject: 983357: Why is it not mentioned in bullseye release notes / installation guide? For at least the release notes, because nobody asked the editors to include it. On 09-02-2022 21:04, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: However, this is a well-known

Re: Bug# 983357: Why is it not mentioned in bullseye release notes / installation guide?

Hi, Subject: 983357: Why is it not mentioned in bullseye release notes / installation guide? For at least the release notes, because nobody asked the editors to include it. On 09-02-2022 21:04, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: However, this is a well-known problem, but neither the Bullseye release

Bug# 983357: Why is it not mentioned in bullseye release notes / installation guide?

Hi, Debian bug #983357 affects d-i when trying to run d-i in a Xen HVM using official Debian installation media (netinst and live iso files, for example). The problem is catastrophic; the bug causes the Xen HVM domain to crash and destroy itself almost immediately, thus preventing anyone from

Re: why doesn't d-i include firmware-b43-installer and firmware-b43legacy-installer?

Broadcom b43 in contrib: > > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye=all=any=names=firmware-b > > Could anybody in the known comment why those firmware packages are not > included in the non-free installer images? Is there anything preventing > their inc

Re: why doesn't d-i include firmware-b43-installer and firmware-b43legacy-installer?

Broadcom b43 in contrib: > > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye=all=any=names=firmware-b > > Could anybody in the known comment why those firmware packages are not > included in the non-free installer images? Is there anything preventing > their inclusion? Or asked in

why doesn't d-i include firmware-b43-installer and firmware-b43legacy-installer?

anybody in the known comment why those firmware packages are not included in the non-free installer images? Is there anything preventing their inclusion? Or asked in a different way: could they be included so the Debian installer supports the users with that hardware? Thanks, *t

Bug#700633: Why this eatmydata patch still not applied to debootstrap? My USB storage devices are slow

Control: tag -1 wishlist On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 03:16:51PM +0300, Askar Safin wrote: > severity -1 normal > thanks > > Hi. > > Why this bug ( https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700633 ) > still is not fixed? > > I did some experiments and here are re

Bug#700633: Why this eatmydata patch still not applied to debootstrap? My USB storage devices are slow

severity -1 normal thanks Hi. Why this bug ( https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700633 ) still is not fixed? I did some experiments and here are results: if I run debootstrap stage of d-i under eatmydata, then its time decreases from 755 s to 370 - 405 s. (I installed Debian

Re: Bug#905793: Why does the Installer formats given swap

On 08/11/2018 01:56 AM, Herbert Kaminski wrote: > Why I care at all: In the past, I used to test the Debian installer on > my main computer as it was the only one with up to date hardware, and I > had on it my working OS and a spare installation, and one or two DI > test installati

Re: Bug#905793: Why does the Installer formats given swap

t; > [...] > > > Well 99.9% of installs don't have another linux on the system, > >^ > > Interesting. How did you get that figure? > > Totally made it up. :) OK, so I assume there is no feedback about who installed what and how and when and where ;-)

Re: Bug#905793: Why does the Installer formats given swap

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:08:52AM +0200, Herbert Kaminski wrote: > Am Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:14:15 -0400 > schrieb lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen): > > > [...] > > Well 99.9% of installs don't have another linux on the system, >^ > Interesting. How did you get that

Re: Bug#905793: Why does the Installer formats given swap

On 08/10/2018 10:08 AM, Herbert Kaminski wrote: > Am Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:14:15 -0400 > schrieb lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen): > >> [...] >> Well 99.9% of installs don't have another linux on the system, >^ > Interesting. How did you get that figure? It's most

Re: Bug#905793: Why does the Installer formats given swap

Am Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:14:15 -0400 schrieb lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen): > [...] > Well 99.9% of installs don't have another linux on the system, ^ Interesting. How did you get that figure? Regards, Herbert

Bug#905793: Why does the Installer formats given swap

On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 07:37:15PM +0200, John Landmesser wrote: > Package: debian-installer > > > is there a reason why the installer defaults to format given swap partition? > > I now know that you can opt out to format swap, but i don't understand that > formatting sw

Bug#905793: Why does the Installer formats given swap

Package: debian-installer is there a reason why the installer defaults to format given swap partition? I now know that you can opt out to format swap, but i don't understand that formatting swap is default! I had several Linux on same PC and after installing aditional debian, the other

Bug#849578: marked as done (task-xfce-desktop: Why you use the vlc player in the task-xfce-desktop meta package?)

Your message dated Wed, 23 May 2018 22:51:16 + with message-id <e1flcbe-000dkc...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#849578: fixed in tasksel 3.44 has caused the Debian Bug report #849578, regarding task-xfce-desktop: Why you use the vlc player in the task-xfce-desktop meta p

Bug#849578: task-xfce-desktop: Why you use the vlc player in the task-xfce-desktop meta package?

Control: tag -1 + pending On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 08:37:19AM +, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > Once again, I have strictly no advice about this. Formerly in the bug > report, Yves-Alexis didn't really object but argued about VLC being > kind of the reference player which "everybody" expects. On

Processed: Re: Bug#849578: task-xfce-desktop: Why you use the vlc player in the task-xfce-desktop meta package?

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + pending Bug #849578 [task-xfce-desktop] task-xfce-desktop: Why you use the vlc player in the task-xfce-desktop meta package? Added tag(s) pending. -- 849578: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849578 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#849578: task-xfce-desktop: Why you use the vlc player in the task-xfce-desktop meta package?

Quoting Jürgen Göricke (bugrep...@mag-keinen-spam.de): > Hello everyone, > > because this bug report is still not closed, I would like to check the status > of this bug report after more than a year and after the release of Debian > Stretch. > When is it planned to replace the VLC Media Player

Bug#849578: task-xfce-desktop: Why you use the vlc player in the task-xfce-desktop meta package?

Hello everyone, because this bug report is still not closed, I would like to check the status of this bug report after more than a year and after the release of Debian Stretch. When is it planned to replace the VLC Media Player with Xfce's own Media Player Parole? And no, the VLC player is not

Re: Beginner question - stable installer build fails - why?

On Sun, 2018-01-28 at 13:01 +1300, Alex King wrote: > * Follow https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2017/12/msg00375.html to build > with a backports kernel. > * Try to do the same with Jessie, which is what my customer actually wants. > * Make whatever changes necessary so the backport kernel is

Re: Beginner question - stable installer build fails - why?

terest in that for people trying to get older > versions on latest hardware, which is my use case. We're aware of that. That's why these patches were crafted in the first place. We need to get around merging what's been proposed a while ago, and see what's needed on the infra side to get

Re: Beginner question - stable installer build fails - why?

Alex King (2018-01-28): > > Also, build/README contains this: > > | Recipe: > > | - Install the build-dependencies on the host system > > |(run dpkg-checkbuilddeps in the parent installer/ directory). > > | - Create your own sources.list.udeb.local, otherwise the build

Re: Beginner question - stable installer build fails - why?

On 28/01/18 12:51, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Alex King (2018-01-28): I wanted to build a net installer that would load stable (actually jessie but I'll start with stable) but using a recent kernel. Firstly I went to https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller#Development and

Re: Beginner question - stable installer build fails - why?

Indeed that worked very well and resulted in a successful build, thank you. My next steps: * Follow https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2017/12/msg00375.html to build with a backports kernel. * Try to do the same with Jessie, which is what my customer actually wants. * Make whatever changes

Re: Beginner question - stable installer build fails - why?

Alex King (2018-01-28): > I wanted to build a net installer that would load stable (actually jessie > but I'll start with stable) but using a recent kernel. > > Firstly I went to https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller#Development and >

Re: Beginner question - stable installer build fails - why?

Hi, thanks for your help, see below regarding documentation. On 28/01/18 00:52, Geert Stappers wrote: On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:38:54AM +1300, Alex King wrote: I'm trying to build an installer following build/README, but must have something basic wrong.  So far I have: * apt-get source

Re: Beginner question - stable installer build fails - why?

Hi, Alex King (2018-01-27): > I'm trying to build an installer following build/README, but must have > something basic wrong.  So far I have: > > * apt-get source debian-installer > * Install the build-dependencies on the host system > * (did not install a sources list as

Re: Beginner question - stable installer build fails - why?

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:38:54AM +1300, Alex King wrote: > I'm trying to build an installer following build/README, but must > have something basic wrong.  So far I have: > > * apt-get source debian-installer > * Install the build-dependencies on the host system > * (did not install a

Beginner question - stable installer build fails - why?

I'm trying to build an installer following build/README, but must have something basic wrong.  So far I have: * apt-get source debian-installer * Install the build-dependencies on the host system * (did not install a sources list as I'm happy with the system one) * make build_netboot This

Why my system boots no more when I add a USB disk ?

It is a "simple" system with legacy boot and btrfs disks (described here https://wiki.couderc.eu/doku.php?id=public:a_perfect_btrfs_server). "simple" but I had to force grub reinstall for it to boot first time. Now it boots very fine. But if I connect a USB hard disk  (formatted in bftrs with

Fw: Why I wasted Debian's bandwidth

23:07:54 +0200 (CEST) De : Seb <s...@h-k.fr> À : Mike <mickael.prof...@h-k.fr> Sujet : Why I wasted Debian's bandwidth Hi Mike, Sorry to write to you in English. I reinstalled Debian on my home computer this week and ran into a few problems that should interest someone in D

Bug#816892: why is sync needed?

I wonder why the sync was needed. I cannot find any info in the git logs. It seems to be there for a long time. IMO this should be removed, if noone can argue why it is needed. -- regards Thomas

Re: why is debianroot via HTTP not a security vulnerability to docker 32bit?

On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 10:52 +, 7fjmqh+nfs4gwozk2w26fylhky...@guerrillamail.com wrote: [...] > In his repository I find the build definition for docker 32bit > debian, c.f. https://github.com/docker-32bit/debian/blob/i386/build-i > mage.sh. In there I see he sets up the mirror and pretty much

why is debianroot via HTTP not a security vulnerability to docker 32bit?

hi, I had a look how docker images for 32bit are built. Despite looking very official by their namespace, 32bit/ubuntu and 32bit/debian I found that "32bit" is nothing more than an idividual guy who created an account at docker hub in oct/2010. (https://hub.docker.com/u/32bit/) He created an

Bug#849578: task-xfce-desktop: Why you use the vlc player in the task-xfce-desktop meta package?

; What is the problem with parole to add the task-xfce-desktop respectively > tasksel meta packages? > > Why you wan't change the packages? I can't understand it. > > Parole is the default media player from xfce project and not so bloated > as the vlc player. The more impat

Bug#849578: task-xfce-desktop: Why you use the vlc player in the task-xfce-desktop meta package?

Dear Maintainer, see all the dependencies from package vlc in Debian Sid. https://packages.debian.org/sid/vlc http://paste.debian.net/905778 Vlc needs Qt dependencies by default. What is the problem with parole to add the task-xfce-desktop respectively tasksel meta packages? Why you wan't

Bug#849578: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#849578: task-xfce-desktop: Why you use the vlc player in the task-xfce-desktop meta package?

On Thu, 2016-12-29 at 07:58 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > The advantages from parole player are, you don't need Qt dependencies from > > vlc player. The parole player is written in Gtk+, runnig fine and need > > the gstreamer framework only. > >  > > Please do set the parole player as

Bug#849578: task-xfce-desktop: Why you use the vlc player in the task-xfce-desktop meta package?

Quoting Jürgen Göricke (bugrep...@smart-mail.de): > Package: task-xfce-desktop > Version: 3.39 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > why you use the vlc player in the task-xfce-desktop meta package instead > the parole player from xfce project directly? > &

Bug#849578: task-xfce-desktop: Why you use the vlc player in the task-xfce-desktop meta package?

Package: task-xfce-desktop Version: 3.39 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, why you use the vlc player in the task-xfce-desktop meta package instead the parole player from xfce project directly? The advantages from parole player are, you don't need Qt dependencies from vlc player. The parole

Bug#764982: Backports, where is the danger (why the FUD)

on all machines I care about, and I never had dependency problems from backports (so far I remember). Good for you. Maybe it's better now, but my opinion still stands. Well, that's a jolly constructive attitude, well done. ... Why!? Why should _I_ adapt to YOUR opinion? What makes you think

Bug#764982: Backports, where is the danger (why the FUD)

On Apr 19, 2015, at 10:48 PM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Backports main is official Debian. [1] You misunderstand the announcement. … official Debian service … Notice the last word here! It say service. Not 'official _PART_ of Debian'! -- Life sucks and then you die -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#764982: Backports, where is the danger (why the FUD)

On Apr 20, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Philip Hands wrote: Turbo Fredriksson tu...@bayour.com writes: Good for you. Maybe it's better now, but my opinion still stands. Well, that's a jolly constructive attitude, well done. Not how I meant it, but thanx for misunderstanding. I meant that my opinion

Re: Bug#764982: Backports, where is the danger (why the FUD)

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 08:26:10AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: While we're at it, it would be nice to have the same Only if I explicitly ask for it feature for non-free (and probably contrib). I may be willing to compromise my freedom in order to get my laptop wifi working, on the basis that

Bug#764982: Backports, where is the danger (why the FUD)

version by using apt-get -t The problem is about packages what are NOT in stable. If you don't want backports for some reason, is easy to disable them in sources.list. Why!? Why should _I_ adapt to YOUR opinion? What makes you think that YOUR opinion is the only, correct one?? Because

Bug#764982: Backports, where is the danger (why the FUD)

that depends on etc, etc. Eventually, you end up with such a bastardizised version of dist, it simply WILL break in mysterious ways (and it have for me, which is why is stopped using it). The correct way is, off course, to do the back port properly, make the software work with the version

Bug#764982: Backports, where is the danger (why the FUD)

lib, that is back ported as well. And the newer lib that depends on etc, etc. Eventually, you end up with such a bastardizised version of dist, it simply WILL break in mysterious ways (and it have for me, which is why is stopped using it). Did you check if it really was backports? I use

Bug#764982: Backports, where is the danger (why the FUD)

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 07:35:21PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: On Apr 19, 2015, at 7:15 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Do you see that ?but?? That's exactly why it's not safe to have this turned on by default. Thank you KiBi! I defiantly don't want back ports enabled by default

Bug#764982: Backports, where is the danger (why the FUD)

to the newer distribution. OR, if they're brave, use back ports. If you don't want backports for some reason, is easy to disable them in sources.list. Why!? Why should _I_ adapt to YOUR opinion? What makes you think that YOUR opinion is the only, correct one?? Debian GNU/Linux don't enable

Bug#753442: why do you blame systemd?

control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi Daniel, thanks for providing more information! cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Processed: Re: Bug#753442: why do you blame systemd?

Processing control commands: tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #753442 [debootstrap] debootstrap: host's /run/shm gets unmounted after debootstrap run Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 753442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753442 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Processed: why do you blame systemd?

Processing control commands: tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #753442 [debootstrap] debootstrap: host's /run/shm gets unmounted after debootstrap run Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #753442 to the same tags previously set -- 753442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753442 Debian

Bug#753442: why do you blame systemd?

control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi Bastian, why do you blame systemd for this breakage? Also, Daniel, did you try to bootstrap wheezy or sid? And are you running systemd? cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Processed: why do you blame systemd?

Processing control commands: tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #753442 [debootstrap] debootstrap: host's /run/shm gets unmounted after debootstrap run Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 753442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753442 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#753442: why do you blame systemd?

Also, Daniel, did you try to bootstrap wheezy or sid? And are you running systemd? Like I saide: of wheezy/jessie only wheezy is affected. The commands I ran are # debootstrap wheezy /tmp/wheezy http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian and # debootstrap jessie /tmp/jessie

Bug#753442: why do you blame systemd?

And are you running systemd? Oh I forgot to mention: the host used to build the chroots is plain wheezy, not running systemd: # dpkg -l | grep systemd ii libsystemd-login0:amd64 44-11+deb7u4 amd64 systemd login utility library # aptitude why libsystemd-login0 i rhythmbox Depends dbus i

Re: Bug#698480: mention why Debian doesn't provide a net boot site and one must set up ones own

/ch04s05.html.en should mention Why can't I just boot from e.g., some boot.debian.org or 1.2.3.4 site? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#698480: mention why Debian doesn't provide a net boot site and one must set up ones own

Processing control commands: reassign -1 installation-guide-i386 Bug #698480 [www.debian.org] mention why Debian doesn't provide a net boot site and one must set up ones own Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'installation-guide-i386'. Ignoring request to alter found versions

In case you wonder why I upload so often...

...after the mass upload. It's mostly because translations keep coming in as I shake each and every translator on the planet to get as complete as possible translation status. I have absolutely *no* control about their schedule and the only method I found is updating affected packages as they

Bug#472704: marked as done (Failure while configuring base packages -- But why?)

Your message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:32:20 + with message-id e1snsyg-0006j4...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#472704: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.40 has caused the Debian Bug report #472704, regarding Failure while configuring base packages -- But why? to be marked as done. This means

Bug#627315: Why partman calculate the total size as size of all partition + LVM + all partitions inside the LVM ?

Hi all, I used the same preseed file on 64 bits and partman has the same issue. Am the only one concerns with this bug? Thanks. Best regards Ludovic -Message d'origine- De : Ludovic BRACHET Envoyé : jeudi 19 mai 2011 15:48 À : sub...@bugs.debian.org Objet : Bug#627315: Why partman

Processed: Re: Bug#627315: Why partman calculate the total size as size of all partition + LVM + all partitions inside the LVM ?

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 627315 partman-auto Bug #627315 [partman] Why partman calculate the total size as size of all partition + LVM + all partitions inside the LVM ? Warning: Unknown package 'partman' Bug reassigned from package 'partman' to 'partman-auto

Bug#472704: Failure while configuring base packages -- But why?

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 05:19:01PM +0200, Eric Estievenart wrote: The issue is likely to be in the functions script : resolve_deps () { local m1=${MIRRORS%% *} # XXX: I can't think how to deal well with dependency resolution and # lots of Packages files. --

May I know why this recipe does not work?

Hi, I have this in my preseed.cfg, but when using this installer to partition, I got no root filesystem is defined. 35|# partition 36|d-i partman-auto/disk string /dev/sda 37|d-i partman-auto/method string lvm 38|d-i partman-lvm/device_remove_lvm boolean true 39|d-i partman-md/device_remove_md

Re: May I know why this recipe does not work?

Sorry this was an old version, missed a few lines. Updated below: # partition d-i partman-auto/disk string /dev/sda d-i partman-auto/method string lvm d-i partman-lvm/device_remove_lvm boolean true d-i partman-md/device_remove_md boolean true d-i partman-lvm/confirm boolean true d-i

Bug#234199: marked as done (Why ask filesystem question on a swap partition)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:36:12 + with message-id 1294184172.2412.165.ca...@eeepc.belkin and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #234199, regarding Why ask filesystem question on a swap partition to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#472704: Failure while configuring base packages -- But why?

Could someone change the title of this bug to something more explicit, like: Dependencies not fetched; unexplained failure (I know they are explained in debootstrap.log), and maybe raise its priority. Btw, I don't really understand the following concept: --no-resolve-deps By default,

Bug#281324: no reason why you--who don't know Bo

infrequently.rtf Description: Binary data

Reasons Why Copules Considder Condoms

Reasnons Why Coupales Consider Condoms www. gen88. net. aMn saved from croc shot inn error -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#472704: Failure while configuring base packages -- But why?

more information. debootstrap should at least tell me which package or which step failed. Are the failures really warning messages (W)? Why does the exit code indicate an error then? Same here: # debootstrap --verbose --resolve-deps --arch i386 sid fo http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian

Why Did She Become a Clal Girl?

inline: Spruel.png

Why it tried connection, since I just install CD1

Hi, I am happy that the lenny is released, but Why it tried connection, since I just install CD1, I have no connection to internet, it took a long time to install because it tried to download I don't know what. I switched to terminal 2 (ctrl+alt+f2) I noticed http process is running ?? I hope

Re: why is apt blocked from testing?

On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 04:36:38PM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: However, according to http://packages.qa.debian.org/apt, apt is currently blocked from testing by pkern. Shouldn't this block be reconsidered given the impact of the bug? The block is temporary until d-i beta2 is out. I

Bug#481844: [Installation Guide] Document disklabel type to use for various subarches and why

On Tuesday 20 May 2008, Frans Pop wrote: Although this is user error, I have no problem with documenting the correct partition types to use for various powerpc systems in the installation guide. However, since that is a nice mess (see below), this should be done by someone more familiar with

Bug#347378: Discover why some men are different

Realize all her dreams and sexual fantasies when she gets rammed by 9 inches of pink meat. http://www.Frenidkly.com/ Original and Still the Best -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#354819: Discover why some men are different

Real men have a genuine large tool- make sure yours measures up. http://www.Frenidkly.com/ Guaranteed Results in Weeks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#286614: Discover why some men are different

Load her up and fill her up with all 9 massive inches of you. http://www.jietuezd.com/ Natural Herbal Formula for Best Results -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: userdevfs support in rootskel - why?

Frans Pop wrote: --- packages/rootskel/debian/changelog (revision 51583) +++ packages/rootskel/debian/changelog (working copy) [...] + [ Joey Hess ] + * Modify init to support userdevfs again. Care to elaborate on this and explain why this is needed? Because the init script

Re: userdevfs support in rootskel - why?

On Wednesday 27 February 2008, Joey Hess wrote: Frans Pop wrote: + [ Joey Hess ] + * Modify init to support userdevfs again. Care to elaborate on this and explain why this is needed? Because the init script was rewritten to for some reason test for a abort if udev is not present

userdevfs support in rootskel - why?

--- packages/rootskel/debian/changelog (revision 51583) +++ packages/rootskel/debian/changelog (working copy) [...] + [ Joey Hess ] + * Modify init to support userdevfs again. Care to elaborate on this and explain why this is needed? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Bug#463765: debian-installer: Installer offers to install grub bootloader on PowerPC. Why?

On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 02:51:08PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Sunday 03 February 2008, Robert Millan wrote: I'm not familiar with this part; could it be that we just need to adjust XB-Installer-Menu-Item in yaboot-installer ? From installer/doc/devel/menu-item-numbers.txt: 7000 apt-setup

Bug#463765: debian-installer: Installer offers to install grub bootloader on PowerPC. Why?

tags 463765 + pending thanks On Monday 04 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please post patches (including changelog entry) to the list before committing. Here's a patch based on your advice. Unfortunately I can't test it, because my Efika

Bug#463765: marked as done (debian-installer: Installer offers to install grub bootloader on PowerPC. Why?)

Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#463765: fixed in grub-installer 1.28 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#463765: debian-installer: Installer offers to install grub bootloader on PowerPC. Why?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 463765 + pending Bug#463765: debian-installer: Installer offers to install grub bootloader on PowerPC. Why? There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#463765: debian-installer: Installer offers to install grub bootloader on PowerPC. Why?

Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please post patches (including changelog entry) to the list before committing. Here's a patch based on your advice. Unfortunately I can't test it, because my Efika died. Hopefully someone else can. Please, feel free to commit it if nobody points

Processed: Re: Bug#463765: debian-installer: Installer offers to install grub bootloader on PowerPC. Why?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 463765 grub-installer 1.26 Bug#463765: debian-installer: Installer offers to install grub bootloader on PowerPC. Why? Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `grub-installer'. severity 463765 serious Bug#463765: debian-installer

Bug#463765: debian-installer: Installer offers to install grub bootloader on PowerPC. Why?

reassign 463765 grub-installer 1.26 severity 463765 serious thanks On Sunday 03 February 2008, Rick Thomas wrote: It was a nominal installation until it came time to write a boot loader. It presented me with a top-level installer menu, with Install GRUB boot loader hilighted. On Sunday 03

Bug#463765: debian-installer: Installer offers to install grub bootloader on PowerPC. Why?

On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 11:55:23AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: Robert: I guess this must be because of your changes in version 1.26? It's possibly OK to offer grub2 as an option for powerpc, but I doubt it should be the default choice at this point. Also, if only some subarchitectures are

Bug#463765: debian-installer: Installer offers to install grub bootloader on PowerPC. Why?

On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 11:55:23AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Sunday 03 February 2008, Rick Thomas wrote: It may have *meant* GRUB2, but what it *said* was GRUB. In any case, it doesn't work, and presents an impediment to an otherwise nominal installation process. GRUB Legacy and GRUB 2

Bug#463765: debian-installer: Installer offers to install grub bootloader on PowerPC. Why?

On Sunday 03 February 2008, Robert Millan wrote: I'm not familiar with this part; could it be that we just need to adjust XB-Installer-Menu-Item in yaboot-installer ? From installer/doc/devel/menu-item-numbers.txt: 7000 apt-setup pkgsel 7300 palo-installer (hppa) grub-installer

Bug#463765: debian-installer: Installer offers to install grub bootloader on PowerPC. Why?

Package: debian-installer Severity: normal Using this businesscard install disk: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/sid_d-i/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd/ Daily build #2 for powerpc, using installer build from sid These images will install the testing version of Debian, currently

Bug#463765: debian-installer: Installer offers to install grub bootloader on PowerPC. Why?

On Feb 2, 2008, at 11:39 PM, Nick Schmalenberger wrote: Grub does exist for powerpc, grub2 http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/grub2.html but as that page says it has an unsatisfiable dependency right now for powerpc so its broken. Has there been any progress on this since:

Re: d-i initrd flavours: why so many ?

On Sunday 16 December 2007, Mike Hommey wrote: That let me to wonder if there was a reason why there were so many flavours of the debian-installer initrd, and if it would not be more straightforward to reduce their number. Creating such initrds would likely make them too big for some

d-i initrd flavours: why so many ?

Hi, I've been looking for testing d-i images for hd-media, but they don't seem to exist. That let me to wonder if there was a reason why there were so many flavours of the debian-installer initrd, and if it would not be more straightforward to reduce their number. Wouldn't it be better to have

Bug#252164: What IS 0EM Software And Why D0 You Care?

Use addr: babloemka. com (remove space) in your browser Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate $79 Macromedia Flash Professional 8$49 Adobe Premiere 2.0 $59 Corel Grafix Suite X3 $59 Adobe Il1ustrator CS2 $59 Adobe Photoshop CS2

Bug#243011: What IS 0EM Software And Why D0 You Care?

Use addr: babloemka. com (remove space) in your browser Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate $79 Macromedia Flash Professional 8$49 Adobe Premiere 2.0 $59 Corel Grafix Suite X3 $59 Adobe Il1ustrator CS2 $59 Adobe Photoshop CS2

Bug#247611: why are are forget?

http://dnfapet.storylate.net/?627912157916 Check our offer below to find out how much you can save. Todays price off: CI- 2.69$ -ALIS VIAG- 1.88$ -RA SOFT CIAL- 3.93$ -IS SOFT VI- $1.79 -AGRA And thats not all. Go on http://dnfapet.storylate.net/?627912157916 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

  1   2   3   4   >