Re: When SGML formatting fixes hit translators

2002-03-05 Thread Rob Bradford
Please think of us for a moment before submitting such patches (and reformatting large paragraphs after deleting a word). I am sure that robster had all the best intentions and were not at all aware of this side effect when submitting the patch. Of course the SGML source should not be

Re: When SGML formatting fixes hit translators

2002-03-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit: Please think of us for a moment before submitting such patches (and reformatting large paragraphs after deleting a word). I am sure that robster had all the best intentions and were not at all aware of this side effect when submitting

Re: When SGML formatting fixes hit translators

2002-03-04 Thread Claus Hindsgaul
Well, I'm not sure it makes sense for translators to follow re-filling of text, since word lengths are not consistent. Why not just use 'diff -b'? Or is there something I'm missing? Agreed, it does not make sence at all to obey the original line wraps. Thanks for the tip. I tried inserting

Re: When SGML formatting fixes hit translators

2002-03-03 Thread Philip Blundell
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 18:50, Claus Hindsgaul wrote: - pDebian 3.0 is much more secure that previous releases. Looks like that that is a typo. p. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: When SGML formatting fixes hit translators

2002-03-03 Thread Colin Walters
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 13:50, Claus Hindsgaul wrote: Please think of us for a moment before submitting such patches (and reformatting large paragraphs after deleting a word). I am sure that robster had all the best intentions and were not at all aware of this side effect when submitting the