Re: Which pseudo-package do ARM netboot image slices belong to?

appropriate, > > > but then got no (maintainer) response for a week. That delay might be > > > perfectly fine (I often have far worse reaction time myself), but made > > > me wonder: Did I file it wrongly, so that the bug isn't "heard"?

Re: Which pseudo-package do ARM netboot image slices belong to?

tly fine (I often have far worse reaction time >> myself), but made me wonder: Did I file it wrongly, so that the bug >> isn't "heard"? >> >> Which pseudo-package do ARM netboot image slices belong to? [...] > Karsten, Ian, and other arm people, > > This

Re: Which pseudo-package do ARM netboot image slices belong to?

Jonas Smedegaard (2015-11-11): > Ohh, that'd be great - also to ease ability for anyone to inspect how > those images was created. > > Until (eventually) packaged, can someone help point to the code to > create those images? Well, src:debian-installer… > @Cyril: Regarding the

Re: Which pseudo-package do ARM netboot image slices belong to?

wonder: Did I file it wrongly, so that the bug isn't "heard"? > > Which pseudo-package do ARM netboot image slices belong to? > > or more generally: > > Is there some way of verifying which pseudo-package(s) is(/are) > appropriate for targeting a bugreport, when web addr