On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 09:55:39AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
I think some of the stuff in console-cyrillic should be merged
into console-common post-sarge; console-common is due for a
rewrite: mostly to debconf' the font, etc. settings,
but also make it more robust.
I see that many
27 2004 Eugeniy Meshcheryakov :
Is it possible to configure console font automatically and ask for
keymap in second stage?
Today I uploaded a new version of console-cyrillic where I changed the
Debconf part in the following way.
When the package is not installed for first time, for example
Anton Zinoviev :
27 2004 Eugeniy Meshcheryakov :
Is it possible to configure console font automatically and ask for
keymap in second stage?
My idea was automatically configure console font in d-i and ask wheter
user want to use console-cyrillic to setup keyboard in second stage (as
fix
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 09:55:39AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
I think some of the stuff in console-cyrillic should be merged
into console-common post-sarge; console-common is due for a
rewrite: mostly to debconf' the font, etc. settings,
but also make it more robust.
I see that many
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 07:07:07PM +0300, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:
Is it possible to configure console font automatically and ask for
keymap in second stage?
My idea was automatically configure console font in d-i and ask wheter
user want to use console-cyrillic to setup keyboard in
Anton Zinoviev :
26 2004 Eugeniy Meshcheryakov :
Anton Zinoviev :
Another difference (that made console-cyrillyc the best choice for the
Cyrillic languages) are the debconf questions during the installation.
Oops, now there is no such question for Serbian, Russian and Ukrainian :-)
Hi,
Sorry I'm a bit late to the thread;
I think a bit of reorganisation of console-* would be a
good idea, post sarge. (Note, with a freeze planned for July 31,
I'm working towards fixing bugs on console-* packages before
then; no disruptive stuff right now).
I've posted some notes on plans I
[Alastair McKinstry]
As there appears to be little interest in console-{tools,data}
development upstream, I'm working towards merging stuff back
to kbd.
FYI I am currently discussing with kbd maintainer and will
surely take it over very soon, but I will give it away if
you want to maintain it
It would be easier to get the console setup right during installation
if all the console configuration stuff worked the same for all.
console-cyrillic seem to be an exception. Why isn't the content and
behaviour of console-cyrillic merged into console-data/console-tools?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
* Petter Reinholdtsen [2004-07-26 11:57:29+0200]
It would be easier to get the console setup right during installation
if all the console configuration stuff worked the same for all.
console-cyrillic seem to be an exception. Why isn't the content and
behaviour of console-cyrillic merged into
[Recai Oktas]
IMO, the current situation is not wrong, due to its cyrillic
spefisic content it is something that should be maintained
seperately.
I don't understand this argument. With the same argument, we should
have console-latin1, console-ascii, console-big5, and so on and so
forth. And
Petter Reinholdtsen :
It would be easier to get the console setup right during installation
if all the console configuration stuff worked the same for all.
console-cyrillic seem to be an exception. Why isn't the content and
behaviour of console-cyrillic merged into console-data/console-tools?
* Petter Reinholdtsen [2004-07-26 12:49:04+0200]
[Recai Oktas]
IMO, the current situation is not wrong, due to its cyrillic
spefisic content it is something that should be maintained
seperately.
I don't understand this argument. With the same argument, we should
have console-latin1,
At 26 Jul 04 11:35:32 GMT,
Recai Oktas wrote:
* Petter Reinholdtsen [2004-07-26 12:49:04+0200]
[Recai Oktas]
IMO, the current situation is not wrong, due to its cyrillic
spefisic content it is something that should be maintained
seperately.
I don't understand this argument. With
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 12:49:04PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The difference is only in the
content of some data files, and how these are applied to the linux
console. I do not understand why it has to be a separate package.
The name of this package chosen by the upstream is
Anton Zinoviev :
Another difference (that made console-cyrillyc the best choice for the
Cyrillic languages) are the debconf questions during the installation.
Oops, now there is no such question for Serbian, Russian and Ukrainian :-)
By the way, what do you think about bug #260227?
--
To
* Kenshi Muto [2004-07-26 22:00:22+0900]
At 26 Jul 04 11:35:32 GMT,
Recai Oktas wrote:
[...]
The difference mainly comes from the fact that each of the console
handling packages mentioned above needs special treatment and we should
leave this task to the most eligible developer, that is,
26 2004 Eugeniy Meshcheryakov :
Anton Zinoviev :
Another difference (that made console-cyrillyc the best choice for the
Cyrillic languages) are the debconf questions during the installation.
Oops, now there is no such question for Serbian, Russian and Ukrainian :-)
Oops! I decided
Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Then in tasksel I selected no tasks. I expected that only a small
number of packages will be installed but what a surprise: the result was
a system with about 1GB installed packages that contained even
OpenOffice! This is a grave bug, OpenOffice
19 matches
Mail list logo
