I may have been too hasty in fixing the sparc build failure. (see recent cvs
activity)
After further investigation I notice that I may have broken powerpc in the
process. Not having a powerpc machine to test on I don't know if that is the
case.
I'm looking for some input.
Here's the story:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: kernel-image-sparc-2.4
Boot floppies should really get it's own set of local headers so it
doesn't have to include kernel headers. This will avoid the conflicts.
Why kernel 2.4 though? Boot floppies mostly uses kernel 2.2 and every
arch uses a
David Whedon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe I should do this? Looks ugly, but might not break ppc:
Index: partbl_msdos.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-boot/boot-floppies/utilities/libfdisk/partbl_msdos.c,v
retrieving revision
Package: kernel-image-sparc-2.4
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:19:01AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
I can't build the woody version on sparc:
gcc -Wall -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -c -o partbl_msdos.o partbl_msdos.c
In file included from /usr/include/asm/string.h:11,
I can't build the woody version on sparc:
gcc -Wall -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -c -o partbl_msdos.o partbl_msdos.c
In file included from /usr/include/asm/string.h:11,
from /usr/include/linux/string.h:21,
from /usr/include/asm-sparc/unaligned.h:6,
5 matches
Mail list logo
